LIKE much current discussion, Hamish MacPherson’s profile article of December 29 (“This country is not – and has never been – a principality”), though well-intentioned, tilts at windmills.
In fact, Scotland’s route to independence is not elusive, and no magic formula need be sought in the entrails of the Act of Union, which he regards as “the key to such an exit” because it uses the word “kingdom” rather than “state”, whatever he means by that. He betrays his own lack of confidence by pleading that the case should be made by “our best lawyers”. Well, good luck with that fond hope.
Why don’t we just stop such pointless navel-gazing? Bewilderingly, the notion that there is some legal bar to progress is found only amongst our fellow nationalists, desperate to find a way out of what they see as a constraining net. They are encouraged in this fruitless exercise by the SNP’s own blind adherence to the one route to independence that London might well have a veto over, like it or not, and that is a referendum.
Scotland today is part of the Union not because of 1707, but because in 2014 the majority of its people democratically voted No. If we had voted differently, we would have been independent years ago. We now need to have the vote again. It is very simple. There are only two requirements: a leadership which will give us the vote (either by referendum or by election), and a Yes result.
We don’t know if London would try to stymie a referendum by taking Holyrood’s legislation to court, or if any such blocking attempt would succeed. We do know that London could and would do nothing to prevent Scottish independence if we voted for it in a General Election under the appropriate manifesto. That was always the way envisaged, both by London and by nationalists, and it still applies.
The UK constitution, if it even matters on the question, contains no provision whatsoever to prevent Scotland from leaving, and no UK government will depart from their repeated assertion that the Union is voluntary and consensual. So if it turns out that a referendum cannot take place, it is of no consequence, because the electoral route remains open.
By merely acknowledging this fact of the matter, the SNP would unclutter the whole discourse and re-invigorate the movement. So far, they show no sign of doing so, having trapped themselves on the line between irrationality and insanity.
In his recent interview by Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp, Mike Russell contemptuously refused to face the question of what the Scottish Government would do if London managed to block a referendum, babbling phrases like “not going to speculate – confident we will have a referendum – we have a democratic right – the ball is in their court”. Given our constitutional and legal position, in which the people of Scotland are NOT prevented from exercising our inalienable right to self-determination, such drivel is not just silly, but crazy. It is mortifyingly enervating for otherwise good and sensible people who wish for independence to constantly regurgitate the craven nonsense that it is being prevented. If we do go independent, and the sooner the better, we may hope that our lamentable self-destructive characteristic is one of the first things to be jettisoned.
Alan Crocket
Motherwell
NOW it looks like the Prime Minister of England is being led by “100” backbenchers. But these cruel, corrupt lodgers are quite happy to cut pensions up and stop the £20-a-week Universal Credit uplift while lining the pockets of their party “donors”.
Meanwhile, up goes the cost of living, gas and electricity like never before in modern times. Food banks and children in poverty are reaching record levels. We, us in Scotland, can do so so much better than this.
Let us all work together in 2022 and make this magnificent country of ours free.
A guid New Year tae yin and aw!
Ken McCartney
Hawick
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel