THE Scottish Parliament Corporate Body has asked the Home Office to designate the Scottish Parliament a “protected site” on national security grounds, effectively meaning that anyone standing outside can be removed by the police if they are “without lawful authority” to be there.
The architect of the Scottish Parliament, Enric Miralles, said: “The seats of the parliament are a fragment of a large amphitheatre where citizens can sit on the landscape”, “The natural amphitheatre will be the first form in the land ... between citizens and the building ... a physical representation of a participatory attitude to sit together – gathering”, “to carve in the land the form of gathering people together”, “citizens, sitting, resting, thinking...”
READ MORE: Green MSP granted urgent question on Holyrood protest curbs
The law change completely disrespects the architect’s vision and ignores the purpose of the space outside our parliament, which is intended as a space for people to gather without the risk of being lifted merely for being there. This law change shows complete disrespect for the architect, his intentions, our magnificent world-class parliament and our citizens.
Alasdair Smith
Eastwood
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here