I AM writing to voice my concern over one or two points regarding the independence movement here in Scotland at the moment. Like my Argyll and Bute friend and colleague David MacEwan Hill (Letters, August 3), I have watched with some sorrow as the party I have supported all my life drifts a little. After the huge rise in membership over the last few years, there indeed seems to be an urge for greater centralisation.
This will destroy the abilities that many members have for putting the strength of local issues onto a national platform under the umbrella of the SNP.
I know that Nicola has been – and is – doing a great job, but I started delivering leaflets when I was 12, I am now 76 and do not really wish to grab the bag of leaflets, have my knuckles poised for the door-knocking, just for another ordinary election.
READ MORE: Relentless centralising of power by the SNP is a cause for concern
Now we must have the ammunition to go on the attack constructively for a tangible result which will bring independence. This movement was founded on the hard work, intelligence, and unstinting unity of Scotswomen and men who would not under any circumstances become guilty of seeing Scotland disappear. For some their involvement with the SNP put their careers and jobs at threat and it cost them dearly.
With no disrespect to our present members, I really do not feel in tune with what I call “Trendy-Wendyism”. I remain, however, a totally committed fighter for Scotland’s independent future, but, as you can see, the years are running in!
Like Dave Hill, I regret the change in the vetting procedure in the SNP, and conferences would seem to be a lot less than electrifying, though I have not attended one since 2005. There once was a political party in Scotland whose grip on everything and everybody was total – where are they now I wonder? Like the contributor in yesterdays National from Selkirk, I am not in any “camp”.
I have one last greet. Having canvassed for, and worked under the leadership of, many hugely capable women at branch, constituency, and now country level, I find the idea of closed female-only parliamentary lists to be totally undemocratic and dangerous for us. All those who wish to contest an election should throw their hats in the ring and allow the membership to choose a suitable candidate.
That large membership with its varied views must stay united until post-referendum before airing their differences. We sit astride the dyke of hope and reality, there is nothing, repeat NOTHING, our opponents are not capable of to keep their Union. At this late stage in life I have no wish to slide off that dyke and land back down the “snake’ tail”, I really could not take that.
We must stick together, against the most anti-Scottish, lying, incompetent Westminster government I can remember. The sooner the greater Yes movement becomes organised the better it will be. No more wee splinter groups please. Best wishes to our government, its officers, and all our members – stay together and we will make it this time.
Colin Stevenson
Strachur, Argyll
HAS Kenny MacAskill lost the plot? Does he and the rest of those stirring up unrest within the SNP live in a parallel universe where Covid does not exist? Multiple marches throughout Scotland to get across our message does not prove a popular activity to win support for the Orange Lodge, quite the opposite, so how does he think that marching will win backing for the SNP?
READ MORE: SNP MP says now is the time for huge indy rally 'on an unprecedented scale'
Regarding the NEC decision on candidates sitting in both parliaments, we cannot criticise others with two jobs when our own elected representatives do similar. It should be the case that if elected for Holyrood that is your main focus and you work on it full-time.
Christine Smith
Troon
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel