IN the past week I have heard Boris Johnson (PM!) refer to the Leader of the Opposition as a “great big girl’s blouse” and as a “chlorinated chicken”, and have read a report of of him referring to David Cameron and his brother Jo as “girly swots”.
This latter “insult” was made apparently as a result of Messrs Cameron and Jo Johnson having had the temerity to attain first-class honours degrees at university. Our PM fell short of this level of academic achievement, and I suppose he thought he could cover this up with an attempt at humour.
These are not merely immature levels of insult – they are positively childish; I’d estimate Primary 1-2 (five-six years old). On Saturday my five-year old granddaughter said to me “grandpa’s a silly daftie poo-poo”. My former primary teacher wife explained to me that she was doing what you might expect of most developing children. She was testing her language skills with an adult whom she knew to be on her side. Who would laugh if her attempt at humour worked, and who, at the very worst, would gently advise her if she had inadvertently moved away from humour and had said something that bordered on inappropriate or even hurtful.
My granddaughter and our PM were on about the same humour level here, but my granddaughter is five years old. What is Mr Johnson’s excuse!
Alex Leggatt
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel