Holograms and body implants will replace handwritten notes and letters as ways people will communicate in the future, a new survey into digital habits has suggested.
A poll of more than 3,000 children and adults in Britain by children’s charity Barnardo’s found that just 13% of young people and 8% of adults believe people will still write messages to each other in 30 years’ time.
Instead, most think people will use holograms – or even implants into the brain or rest of the body – to communicate with one another.
Barnardo’s commissioned the survey to coincide with the 30th anniversary of the launch of the world wide web and a new report from the charity – Generation Digital – which urges the UK Government to introduce new legislation to better protect children online.
The research found that more than half (56%) of young people think spending too much time online and not enough talking to people face-to-face is an issue facing younger internet users in the future.
More than 80% of adults also said they were concerned about the risk of children being groomed, exploited or bullied online.
Barnardo’s chief executive Javed Khan said: “In the last 30 years the way children and adults communicate has changed beyond recognition, so it’s no surprise that in the next 30 years we are headed towards the stuff of science fiction.
“The internet and new technologies have transformed how young people learn, play and communicate – but it’s also created new risks to children’s safety and wellbeing.
“Our laws and systems must keep pace with technological change so we can protect children effectively on and offline.
“This requires urgent changes today – like regulating the internet and giving children the skills to stay safe – but also a longer-term commitment from Government, charities, industry, and other partners, to put children first in an ever-changing digital world.”
Earlier this year, the Government published a white paper around online harms, which proposed new legislation that would greatly increase regulation on technology companies.
The proposals included the introduction of a statutory duty of care, forcing firms to commit to protecting users from harmful content – with large fines and even blocks on websites possible for those who fail to meet the suggested standards.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here