The Scottish Government has been urged to step in and ensure improvements are made in mental health care at NHS Tayside.
Gillian Murray, whose uncle David Ramsay took his life after being refused medical help, insisted that the interim findings of an inquiry into services there was “not nearly as critical” as it should have been.
Former prison chief inspector David Strang led an independent inquiry into mental health services in NHS Tayside after Ms Murray and others raised concerns about the treatment their loved ones received.
Speaking to the Press Association, she said: “The interim report is scathing, nobody can deny that. In fact, the interim report is not nearly as critical as what it should be.
“There are key elements missing but I trust this is purely because it is just the interim report.”
The report highlighted how suicidal patients were “not taken seriously” by health professionals and said there was a “lack of adequate risk assessment”.
It also raised concerns about the use of illegal drugs in the Carseview Centre in Dundee, the shortage of psychiatrists, and the use of restraint on patients.
Ms Murray said her uncle had made several suicides attempts before he sought help.
She said: “The assessment stage is a major issue as the risk assessment stage is where many patients are being turned away and then taking their lives.
“How many lives have been lost or destroyed due to that health board?
“How many suicides have occurred?”
She added: “We cannot trust that NHS Tayside will ‘learn lessons’ from the full report because let’s be honest – this has been nearly 20 years in the making.
“How many lessons does one health board need to learn?
“The Government need to step in here and ensure that changes are implemented and patients are safe.”
NHS Tayside chairman John Brown said work to improve mental health provision was already taking place.
Chief executive Grant Archibald said: “It is clear that we have further work to do but since I came to Tayside I have made mental health a top priority and I am confident we can learn lessons, strengthen our engagement with patients, service users, families and the public and make the right kinds of changes, at the right time, to transform our mental health services.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here