NHS trusts could face significant disruption during junior doctor strikes after hundreds of senior medics threatened not to provide cover for colleagues on picket lines.
More than 800 hospital consultants in London have said they will not provide cover for striking junior doctors unless their employers agree to pay a higher overtime rate set by the British Medical Association (BMA).
Junior doctors in England are set to walk out for 72 hours from 7am on Wednesday June 14.
A new letter, signed by 8.7% of London’s consultants, states some NHS trusts outside of the capital have agreed to pay the higher rate, the Health Service Journal reported.
We deserve full #PayRestoration now.
Read our guidance ahead of taking part in strike action in England from 14 June: https://t.co/OuMLObFqkA #JuniorDoctorsStrike pic.twitter.com/vkrMrCJTr2
— Junior Doctors (@BMA_JuniorDocs) June 4, 2023
The medics, who wrote the letter independently of the BMA, said the NHS in London has an inconsistent stance on the higher pay rate compared to other regions.
It comes as Health Secretary Steve Barclay said there needs to be “movement on both sides” amid the dispute.
He insisted the Government’s door remains open, but accused the BMA’s Junior Doctors Committee of refusing to budge from its 35% pay demand, despite bringing an intermediary to negotiations.
Mr Barclay told BBC Breakfast: “I don’t think a 35% pay rise is a reasonable demand. That’s really what we need to see some movement on.
“We hugely value the work that the junior doctors do, but to date they haven’t been willing to move at all from 35%, and in fact actually move to 49% if you added in next year.”
He told LBC radio: “We had around three weeks of talks with them. They requested that we bring in an intermediary – a very senior NHS leader, Kathy McLean, a very respected figure which the Government agreed to – but notwithstanding that, the Junior Doctors Committee refused to move at all from their request for a 35% pay rise.
“I don’t think it is fair and reasonable.
“We want to work with the junior doctors, we massively value the contribution they make – they are key to our elective recovery and getting our waiting times down.
“But a 35% pay rise, I don’t think is fair and reasonable, and that’s been the sticking point so far.
“Obviously the Government is very keen to engage with them, but we can’t do so whilst (they are) insisting on further strikes.

“Obviously there is an impact on patients when these strikes take place, and we want to work constructively with them.
“But there’s got to be movement on both sides and the Government has signalled its willingness to move. To date, the Junior Doctors Committee has refused to move at all from its 35% demand, and that’s really been the sticking point.”
Dr Vivek Trivedi and Dr Robert Laurenson, co-chairs of the BMA Junior Doctors Committee, said: “With junior doctor pay having eroded by 26% in the last 15 years, and with double-digit inflation this year, the 5% offer the Government made would have amounted to yet more pay cuts.
“That is in no way a fair or reasonable offer and will not help stem the exodus of junior doctors from the NHS.
“The Health Secretary can come to us with a credible offer at any time – preventing any future strike action sits firmly within the gift of the Government.”

Commenting on the letter, a BMA spokesperson said: “The BMA’s rate card has been developed to address the fact that for too long, trusts have been continually leaning on consultants to work many extra hours in excess of their normal contracts, not just during strike days but in the face of rota gaps and chronic workforce shortages, and with an emphasis on clearing the record treatment backlog.
“Crucially, the principle is to ensure that NHS trusts adopt a fairer and more consistent approach to overtime pay nationwide, with rates based on those already being offered in parts of the country to reflect the market value of doctors’ work.
“This letter, put together by grassroots doctors in the capital, emphasises the strength of feeling among the profession that their time, expertise and well-being are not being fairly and appropriately valued by trusts, and thus underlining the very reasons that the rate card was developed in the first place.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel