A Los Angeles judge has dismissed one of 11 sexual assault counts against Harvey Weinstein, giving the former film mogul and convicted rapist a minor and possibly temporary victory.
At a hearing with the 69-year-old in the courtroom, Judge Lisa B Lench agreed with his defence lawyers that a count alleging sexual battery by restraint in May 2010 was too old, and outside the statute of limitations.
But she gave the prosecution permission to refile the charge in a way that may be allowable, setting up an ongoing fight.
Weinstein pleaded not guilty to four counts of rape and seven other sexual assault counts last week in his first court appearance in the California case.
He was extradited from New York, where he is serving a 23-year sentence for convictions of rape and sexual assault.
In Los Angeles, Weinstein was first charged with the now-dismissed count in January 2020, before the statute of limitations had expired.
Prosecutors then got an indictment from a grand jury on an identical count six months later, when the time had lapsed.
Weinstein’s lawyers successfully argued at Thursday’s hearing that the grand jury indictment counted as a new case, making the charge “fatally flawed”.
“No-one forced the prosecution to go to the grand jury,” Weinstein lawyer Alan Jackson said in court.
“They chose to enter a new case.”
Prosecutors argued that it was a continuation of the same case and should be considered what is often called a superseding indictment.
Other charges against Weinstein are for even older incidents, but different statutes apply to them.
Outside court, the defence touted the ruling as a significant victory, pointing out that it removes one of the five women involved in the 11 counts.
“Twenty percent of the district attorneys case has just been thrown out,” Weinstein lawyer Mark Werksman said.
None of the women have been identified.
The judge sided with the prosecution on two other counts that she refused to dismiss, rejecting defence arguments those incidents were also too old.
No trial date has been set for Weinstein.
More technical fights are likely to come before it begins as his lawyers seek to erode the case against him.
They have said the charges are all baseless, old and uncorroborated.
Weinstein was brought into court in a wheelchair wearing brown county jail attire.
A bailiff unshackled him from the chair and put him next to his lawyers.
The lawyers argued that Weinstein should be allowed to change into a suit for this and similar proceedings, a move that is standard for a jury trial but less common for pre-trial hearings.
Mr Werksman called the jail clothes a “mark of Cain” that branded his client a criminal in photos and video from the courtroom.
The judge rejected the argument, suggesting the attire was not so bad.
“Mr Weinstein is wearing a brown top,” Judge Lench said.
“You know it’s jail attire, but I’m not sure everybody knows it’s jail attire.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here