Trade unions and opposition politicians have hit out at the UK and Scottish governments after Burntisland Fabrications (BiFab) went into administration.
The firm took the decision after saying ministers had refused to provide more funding and nationalisation was ruled out.
Calls have now been made for “all options” to be considered to save jobs at the company’s sites.
STUC general secretary Roz Foyer said: “Today’s announcement is the latest stage in a sorry saga of government and corporate failure, with the victims being workers and their families from Fife to the islands.
“These failures began over a decade ago with false promises of Scotland becoming ‘the Saudi Arabia of renewables’ without an investment and industrial strategy to match.
“No statement of commitment to move forward and create clean energy and renewables supply chain jobs will be believed unless government and big business accept their previous failings.”
The “Saudia Arabia of renewables” tagline was used by Alex Salmond when he was first minister.
Trade union secretaries Gary Smith and Pat Rafferty, from GMB Scotland and Unite Scotland respectively, said: “BiFab’s administration exposes the myth of Scotland’s renewables revolution as well as a decade of political hypocrisy and failure, in Scotland and the rest of the UK.
“Shamefully the Scottish Government has buried these hopes just in time for Christmas and they have worked together with UK Government in doing so.
“A decade on from the promise of a ‘Saudi Arabia of renewables’ and 28,000 full-time jobs in offshore wind manufacturing, we’ve been left with industrial ruins in Fife and Lewis.”
BiFab, which has yards in Burntisland and Methil in Fife as well as one on Lewis, had to be rescued by the Scottish Government in 2017.
The firm had been preparing to put up to 500 employees back to work on a wind turbine scheme when it emerged ministers could no longer provide the necessary financial support.
The Scottish Government had argued that state aid rules prevented it from bailing out the company, but ministers have committed to securing a new future for the BiFab sites.
The Scottish Greens claim other European countries have state-supported supply chains.
The party’s energy spokesman Mark Ruskell said: “This has come about because both the UK and Scottish governments lack the political will to protect jobs and commit to the renewables revolution Scotland can deliver.
“It’s time for them to put together a public ownership model that will finally deliver jobs for BiFab.”
Scottish Labour economy spokesman Alex Rowley also condemned the “lack of political will” as he called for action to stop “one of the jewels in the crown of Scottish manufacturing” being lost.
He said: “The failure of the SNP Government to work with the company and the trade unions to find a way forward is unforgivable and the consequences of that failure is that Scotland will continue to lose out on thousands of jobs in the renewable sector.
“All possible options available to salvage the jobs must be put on the table.”
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie added: “This was a golden opportunity to connect our battle against climate change with jobs in industrial communities across the country, but the Government has wasted over £52 million creating a couple of hundred temporary jobs.
“The Bifab debacle has been little more than a very expensive publicity stunt.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here