Shares in some of Britain’s biggest pub chains felt the pinch on Tuesday morning following reports that Prime Minister Boris Johnson will set a curfew on drinking establishments.
City Pub Group led the pack lower, with shares falling 6.6%.
Wetherspoons, perhaps Britain’s most famous chain of pubs, felt more resilient, with shares merely dropping 0.4%, and some watering holes actually rose.
From Thursday Britain’s pubs, bars and restaurants will be forced to close by 10pm under restrictions that the Prime Minister is expected to announce on Tuesday evening.
Covid-19 cases have spiked in recent weeks following a drive to get people back into restaurants in August and pushes to make office staff go back to their workplaces.
Marston’s fell by 2.8% and Fuller, Smith & Turner dropped by 4.8% as markets opened in London on Tuesday morning.
Meanwhile, investors in Mitchells & Butlers felt more positive, sending its shares up by 2.5%, and Young And Co’s rose 1.9%.
Tom Musson, an analyst covering pub landlord NewRiver at Liberum, said that companies with pubs in the suburbs are less likely to be harmed by the change.
“Closing at 10pm is going to have more of an impact on town centre and city centre pubs and bars,” he said.
He added: “It is quite possible customers, and certainly those working at home, just come to the pub sooner.”
But the 10pm curfew was met with much more worry from trade body UKHospitality. It’s chief executive, Kate Nicholls, said on Monday evening that the restrictions would be “another crushing blow” for hospitality businesses and called for the rules to be applied flexibly.
“A hard close time is bad for business and bad for controlling the virus – we need to allow time for people to disperse over a longer period,” she said.
“It is hard to understand how these measures are the solution to fighting the disease when Government data shows that just 5% of infections out of the home are related to hospitality. Where such restrictions have been put in place locally they have not cut infection rates, merely damaged business and cost jobs.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel