THE Cop26 international summit should result in a “Glasgow agreement” named after its host city in the same way as the Paris accord, the UK’s climate change minister hopes.
Giving evidence to MPs yesterday, Anne-Marie Trevelyan said she does not yet know what the deal will be named, but she hopes “very much it will be called the Glasgow agreement”.
However a member of the Cabinet Office’s Cop26 unit, Dr John Murton, cautioned that the upcoming meeting will not result in a new over-arching climate agreement.
Glasgow will host the UN climate meeting in November, which is expected to be the most significant environmental summit since Paris in 2015.
MPs from several Westminster committees joined a special session of the Scottish Affairs Committee yesterday to quiz Trevelyan and members of the UK Government’s Cop26 unit on plans for the conference.
MPs were told that Cop26 delegates will be offered coronavirus vaccines by the UK Government.
Stewart McDonald, the SNP MP for Glasgow South, asked the minister about the name of any accord reached, saying “it better be the Glasgow agreement”.
She said: “We don’t yet know what it is but I hope very much it will be called the Glasgow agreement.”
Murton, the UK’s Cop 26 envoy, then told MPs the Glasgow meeting will have a different purpose to its French predecessor.
He said: “A lot of what we will be doing at Glasgow is working out the implementing rules for the Paris Agreement itself.
“So Glasgow is distinct from Paris in that we are not seeking to renegotiate a new over-arching agreement on climate change in the same way as was done with Paris.”
Trevelyan said Cop26 will focus on how countries are delivering Paris Agreement commitments but “it’ll be the Glasgow Cop forever”.
Ros Eales, chief operating officer of the Cop26 unit, told MPs that previous Cop summits had seen around 25,000 attendees and the Government is planning for around this number – though coronavirus makes the exact figures more uncertain.
She said hotel accommodation has been booked in Edinburgh as well as Glasgow for those attending.
The minister was also asked about reports that the UK Government is about to approve a new oil field off the Shetland Islands.
Bristol North West MP Darren Jones asked if this shows “another gap between rhetoric and reality”.
Trevelyan said the Government has a “world-leading” commitment to phasing out unabated coal power.
She said: “In terms of oil, it’s not a new licence, there are no new licences this year.
“This is an extension of an existing oil field.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here