THE BBC has issued a correction after it challenged an SNP minister with comments from a Labour activist who it presented as an independent expert.
On October 28, BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme interviewed Professor June Andrews about the cut to the Winter Fuel Payment.
The Labour Government had ended the universal payments after taking power in a bid to cut costs, leading charities such as Age Scotland to raise concerns that pensioners would bee plunged into poverty.
However, Andrews told the BBC that she supported the Winter Fuel Payment being cut.
READ MORE: UK Government's own analysis reveals harsh impact of Winter Fuel Payment cut
She said: “Rather than complaining to your MP, get a case worker in their office to help you see where you can get more money if you're an older person.
“And those of us like myself, who are really lucky to already have an income, we have to say, ‘well, you know, we didn't deserve this, any more than any of the other rich people in the country deserve this money'.
“The money that we give in tax should be given to families and children and also pensioners who really, really need it, rather than something that's just sparkled around like fairy dust every winter.”
Andrews’ comments were then used by the BBC to challenge SNP minister Ivan McKee, without disclosing her Labour activism.
Appearing on the programme later, McKee was told: “We heard from an expert in care for older people, June Andrews, earlier, who says that actually, it's right that this is means-tested, that money shouldn't be wasted giving pensioners who don't require this money, but more effort needs to be put into making sure that pensioners who do actually claim the benefits that they're entitled to.”
Responding, McKee said that while you could point to rich pensioners who didn’t really need the Winter Fuel Payment, it is “important to recognise … there is a huge number of people” who do.
Now, the BBC has issued an update on its corrections and clarifications page saying that it should have made clear Andrews’ Labour connections.
Her social media feed in the days leading up to her Good Morning Scotland appearance saw her retweet Labour figures including Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves, as well as Labour activists campaigning in a by-election.
In May, Andrews shared an image of herself campaigning for now-Labour MP Gregor Poynton. In August, she shared another of herself visiting him in London.
READ MORE: 'Clueless': Ian Murray and Stephen Flynn clash on winter fuel cut
The BBC statement said: “In an interview about charity Age Scotland’s concern that more older people will be taken to hospital with hypothermia this year following cuts to the Winter Fuel Payment, the programme spoke with a guest as an expert in the care of older people.
“Our editorial guidelines state that: ‘We should not automatically assume that contributors from other organisations (such as academics, journalists, researchers and representatives of charities and think-tanks) are unbiased. Appropriate information about their affiliations, funding and particular viewpoints should be made available to the audience, when relevant to the context.’
“While the contributions from the guest were appropriate for the item, in hindsight, with the interview moving into areas of political decision-making, the programme should have found a way to convey to listeners more information on the guest’s party political standpoint.
“We have reminded our teams of the importance of this in preparing and conducting interviews.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel