THE Scottish Government has “no idea” who the prospective buyer for Grangemouth oil refinery is, the acting Energy Secretary has said despite BBC reports to the contrary.
Gillian Martin told the BBC’s Sunday Show that she had “questions” after SNP MSP Michelle Thomson, who represents Falkirk East, said she had been in talks with a “serious” potential buyer for the site.
Thomson’s intervention came after it was announced that owners Petroineos would close the Grangemouth oil refinery before the summer of 2025, with 400 jobs on the line.
On Saturday, a BBC headline reported that the Scottish Government had held “talks with ‘possible buyer’ for Grangemouth”.
READ MORE: 'It will be a shockwave': Community reacts to fate of Grangemouth oil refinery
However, Martin – who is acting Energy Secretary while Màiri McAllan is on maternity leave – told The Sunday Show that was not the case.
Asked about the prospective buyer, she said: “We have no idea who that is.
“Obviously, Michelle's been speaking to somebody, but the Scottish Government has not spoken to that person or that company, and I am not entirely sure if that person has spoken to Petroineos.
“We need to remember that Petroineos own the site, and if someone is interested in that site, obviously going to Petroineos would be the first thing that they should do.”
Asked why a prospective buyer would be speaking to the area’s local MSP and not Petroineos or the Scottish Government, Martin said: “Well, that's a question for them, because I have the same questions myself.
“I obviously would like to know who they are. I would like to know what their background is, and I think Petroineos obviously would like to have an understanding of who this person is as well.
“We have no information.”
Martin noted that Thomson had told press that she had signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), and said she had previously spoken to the MSP about the prospective buyer but “since then things have been fast moving”.
Thomson had said that the buyer is international, but not Russian, and would be looking to purchase the oil refinery as is with their own funding.
READ MORE: Grangemouth oil refinery 'should not have been left to billionaires'
Asked if the situation all sounded “a bit odd”, Martin responded: “Not necessarily, if they've approached the local MSP, obviously, as the first port of call that's a decision that they have made.
“They haven't approached the government. They haven't to my knowledge approached Petroineos. But of course, things are fast moving, they may do so soon.”
Petroineos is a joint venture between Ineos and PetroChina. It has said the Grangemouth site “faces significant challenges due to global market pressures and the energy transition”.
A spokesperson for Petroineos said the refinery lost around 500,000 US dollars (£381,000) per day last week, and absorbed total losses of 775 million US dollars (£590 million).
Following a meeting with unions and workforce representatives on Friday in nearby Falkirk, the First Minister urged the firm to reconsider.
“I think the decision is premature and I would encourage Petroineos to consider what options there are to prolong the life of the refinery,” he said.
Derek Thomson, Scottish secretary at Unite the union, has said that Project Willow – the work being done by the Scottish and UK governments on a potential future for the site – is “too slow”, adding: “Project Willow is about the work of tomorrow – we need work today.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel