HOLYROOD bosses have responded to criticism after requesting copies of speeches from MSPs.
The Scottish Parliament produces a record – which is not verbatim – of what has been said both in the main debating chamber and committees each day, called the Official Report.
To aid those transcribing proceedings, MSPs are contacted to provide notes and scripts of their contributions.
But criticism reported by The Sun has sparked debate, after unnamed MSPs were quoted as saying the requests, which are also made of MPs in Westminster, “preclude” proper debate.
An anonymous MSP told the paper: “Debate requires interaction that submitting speeches in advance totally precludes.
“Put it another way – we should be making speeches, not submitting essays.”
Another MSP said: “Debates are often a sham because contributions are completely scripted.
“There is an imperative for MSPs to stick to a script.
“The rigid time constraints mean we may only have a few minutes so we’re less likely to take interventions, which stifles debate.”
But others have pointed out that requests for notes are not unusual and happen in both of Scotland’s parliaments.
Former MP Paul Sweeney (above), now a Glasgow MSP, said: “Tighter time limits on debates in the Scottish Parliament are frustrating.
“They inhibit interventions, meaning debates are usually poorer quality than in the Commons, but requests for notes (if used by members) or for clarifications for accuracy are the same in both parliaments.”
READ MORE: 'Not many' Rangers fans among SNP politicians, says Tory MSP
Former presiding officer Tricia Marwick (below) added: “It has always been the case that MSPs provide the Official Report with speeches and notes to ensure accuracy of reporting.”
SNP MSP Elena Whitham said: “Hansard asks the same at Westminster for the official record.
“I provide my speaking notes but regularly change what I say depending on what is emerging during debate via interventions/contributions.”
READ MORE: SNP open to working with Alba or Unionists to pass budget, party says
Responding to the criticism, a spokesperson for the Scottish Parliament told The Sun: “The Official Report requests speaking notes from members to help ensure the fast and accurate production of the written record of what is said in parliamentary debates.
“Providing these notes is entirely voluntary and can assist in clarifying details, such as names or difficult-to-hear words.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel