IT is a “no brainer” that Scotland could build more affordable homes if it had more borrowing powers with independence, the Housing Minister has said.
Paul McLennan told The National's Holyrood Weekly podcast that due to a lack of financial levers, the Scottish Government is limited in how far it can go in building homes.
It comes after figures showed that more affordable housing has been built in Scotland per head of population than in England and Wales.
However, it also emerged this year that Scotland’s homelessness figures saw a large increase, with a record number of children living in temporary accommodation.
READ MORE: See the SNP's key independence motion ahead of party's conference
McLennan said the figures were “concerning” amid a perfect storm of the cost of living crisis and the fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic.
Speaking on our podcast, McLennan said the £3.5 billion made available towards affordable housing this parliamentary term was the limit amid a tight budget.
He added that “without a doubt” independence would allow Scotland to go further in achieving its affordable housing goals.
“Now if we were an independent country, we would have additional borrowing powers,” McLennan said.
“And when you look at the fundamentals round about borrowing for house building, it's a complete no brainer.
“Because if we had more money, we could build more houses.”
McLennan insisted there was “capacity” in Scotland to build more homes, adding: “But the key thing I think, for me, is if we had that additional borrowing power, the business case for building more houses is incredibly strong.
“And we could go out and build more houses in terms of that but we're restricted because the £3.5bn that we have can't go any higher, and that's frustrating.
“And yet we're successful in terms of what we're building in comparison with England and Wales.
READ MORE: Independence supporters react to SNP's conference motion
“If we were an independent country, we could be borrowing more money, building more houses, more construction jobs, saving money in homelessness costs, and making Scotland a healthier – a much healthier – place to live.”
Figures released earlier this month showed that since 2007, Scotland has seen more than 40% more affordable homes built per head of population than England, and 70% more than in Wales.
Almost 11,000 homes were delivered in the year to the end of June, according to quarterly data from the Scottish Government. This is the highest annual figure since 2000.
McLennan added that there were other issues, such as Discretionary Housing Payments, the housing benefit provided by the UK Government to support people to pay their rent or housing costs.
READ MORE: 'Not a mandate': Labour dismiss SNP independence strategy plan
He also pointed to the Local Housing Allowance, rates used to calculate housing benefits for tenants renting for private landlords, and the low rate it is currently set at.
“One of the key things that we kind of touched on with local government is Discretionary Housing Payments. We are spending millions of pounds on that every single year,” the Housing Minister said.
“The Local Housing Allowance which the UK Government controls has been frozen for three years.
“We wrote to the UK Government two or three months ago, we're still to get a reply.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf 'confident' SNP members will back independence strategy
“I raised it with my UK Government equivalent ... still to get that reply.
“We get that from local authorities all across Scotland about the local housing allowance. So that would make a massive difference in terms of that. And as I said the money we're spending on Discretionary Housing Payments, we could be spending that on homes or building more homes. It just defeats the purpose.
“And it comes back to the point about additional borrowing powers – if we had that, we could be building more houses, saving more money and more importantly, giving people a roof over their head.”
The National’s Holyrood Weekly podcast is available to listen to on our website here, on Spotify and the Omny streaming platform.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel