KATE Forbes has said the expulsion of Angus MacNeil from the SNP will do the party “zero favours” in the Western Isles.
MacNeil announced he had been kicked out of the party on Thursday night after publicly clashing with chief whip Brendan O'Hara in the division lobby.
It comes after he was suspended for one week from the party’s Westminster group, which expired on July 12.
On Thursday evening the party's conduct committee met to discuss the Na h-Eileanan an Iar MP’s case after he refused to rejoin the Westminster group, before MacNeil announced on social media he had been expelled.
In an interview with Iain Dale and former home secretary Jacqui Smith at the Edinburgh Fringe on Friday, Forbes – who represents Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch at Holyrood – admitted he did not know what had gone on with MacNeil and the group but insisted she was concerned about the implications it may have in the General Election next year.
READ MORE: What SNP MPs are saying about Angus MacNeil's expulsion
Asked what she thought of MacNeil being expelled – or “leaving” – the party, Forbes said: “I think it’s unfortunate when anyone leaves. I do not know the ins and outs sufficiently of what the case was, but I think this result does us zero favours when it comes to the next election in the Western Isles.
“I don’t know the case, but I do know the outcome does us no services in the Western Isles which is going to be a challenging seat anyway.”
MacNeil – who has said he has no plans to join rival party Alba - has represented the constituency since 2005 but the decision means he cannot sit as an SNP MP any longer and appears to rule out any reconciliation with the party.
He has said he will run in the constituency - a key Labour target - as an independent at the next General Election.
Westminster group leader Stephen Flynn said the party wanted a “positive outcome” but added this was not always possible in politics.
During the interview, Forbes was also asked about her thoughts on the future of the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Greens after she called for a party conference debate on it earlier this week.
Expanding on that, she said she would not want a vote that simply said “Greens out or Greens in”, but wants to debate the substance of the deal.
She said: “I think cooperation matters. This is about the substance of that agreement because we’ve already seen a change to the Bute House Agreement in the form of we were going to implement Highly Protected Marine Areas and ban fishing in 10% of Scotland’s waters, and that’s been changed.”
Asked if this was “Kate Forbes revenge” after the Greens said they would end the Bute House Agreement had she become first minister, she replied: “Not at all.”
When Dale speculated about a vote for Greens in or Greens out, Forbes said: “I wouldn’t want that. I would want a debate about the substance of the Bute House Agreement. I would want to look at whether we are meeting the needs of the people at this time.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel