A RARELY displayed painting with a tragic history is expected to reach up to £150,000 at auction.
Robert Brough, the artist behind Sweet Violets, died from severe burns in a train crash aged 32, just eight years after creating what critics consider his masterpiece.
The oil portrait by the Aberdonian artist, featuring Barbara Staples aged 18 holding a jar of violets, has only been displayed publicly once before, in 1995 at the Aberdeen Art Gallery.
A private collector bought the piece after that exhibition, joining a history of owners including the Staples family and famous surgeon Sir Alexander Ogston.
The auction will be held online by Lyon and Turnbull on Thursday, June 8.
Nick Curnow, Lyon and Turnbull vice-chairman, said: “Brough was young, ambitious, precociously talented and on an impressive career trajectory when he met with a premature death.”
Born to a single mother, lady’s maid to the Duchess of Hamilton, Brough was raised in rural Aberdeen before establishing himself as a favourite of London’s most notable families.
It was a train journey back to London from Scotland in 1905 that hospitalised the young artist, leading to his death two days later in Sheffield.
Part of the late 19th-century movement, he trained in Paris alongside Scottish colourist SJ Peploe and was mentored by leading American artist John Singer Sargent.
Sargent was his mentor and influence, but also a close friend, and sat with Brough’s mother at his bedside.
READ MORE: Alister Jack accused of 'totally inaccurate' deposit return claim
Cunrow said: “It was his untimely ending that prevented him from being fully admitted into the canon of great painters in the history of Scottish art. His obituary recorded that he combined ‘the dash of Sargent and the beautiful refinement of Velazquez'.”
He continued: “Given his short lifespan, Brough wasn’t as prolific as he could have been which means it’s rare to come across one of these paintings on sale.”
From 10am, bidders from across the world are expected to battle in the online auction for this rare piece of Scottish art history.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here