WELSH First Minister Mark Drakeford has said he would dispute the use of the Internal Market Act (IMA) to stop the Scottish Government including glass in its Deposit Return Scheme.
Speaking to BBC Scotland, Drakeford said if the Internal Markets Act is invoked for the purpose of removing glass from Scotland's Deposit Return Scheme there would be “very serious questions”.
There has been speculation that Wales, who had intended to go ahead with their own recycling scheme which includes glass, will no longer be able to do this after the UK Government stepped in to say the Scottish Government could not include glass.
Drakeford said he is “considering the implications” of the decision for the Welsh Government.
“I would dispute the use of the internal market act”
— Glenn Campbell (@GlennBBC) June 1, 2023
Wales FM @MarkDrakeford says he’s considering the implications of UK decision to exclude glass from Scottish deposit return
UK ministers have written to him stressing need for “alignment” across UK nations pic.twitter.com/W8TTjtk1DD
He told the BBC: “We are considering the implications for our scheme, which includes glass and always did.
“It was part of the consultation we held with the NI executive and the UK Government.
“At the moment, glass is in our scheme and that’s the way we expect it to stay.
“We jointly published a document with the UK Government in which they recognised that while they had decided not to include glass, we had and they signed that document with us.
“I would dispute the use of the IMA for these purposes and if they were to invoke it, there would be very serious questions for the UK Government.
“Why so late in the day?
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf and Mark Drakeford urge Westminster to respect devolution
“Why are they doing this now when right up until now they have recognised the fact that we were going to include glass, because that’s what the consultation said we would do?
“The English Government is the outlier here.
“The questions are for them and, of course, we will have to explore that should that be their decision.
“It’s a great shame the UK Government in its English capacity didn’t recognise that because we would have acted as Scotland did, and then they would have had the certainty and continuity they say business needs.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel