THE BBC will review whether it is delivering “impartiality” in its coverage of migration, it has been announced.
The broadcaster’s board will look at how it covers topics such as small boats crossing the English Channel, the admission of Ukrainian refugees and the “impact of migration on communities in the UK”.
Madeleine Sumption, director of the Migration Observatory at Oxford University, and Samir Shah, chief executive of independent production company Juniper, will jointly chair and author the review.
A BBC statement said: “The review will assess coverage of topics such as ‘small boats’ crossing the English Channel; the admission of refugees fleeing Ukraine following the Russian invasion; the impact of migration on communities in the UK including the devolved nations and the English regions; the UK Government’s policy on sending some asylum seekers to Rwanda; and coverage of public announcements about migration.
READ MORE: BBC's Fiona Bruce slammed for 'unacceptable framing' of SNP on Question Time
“It will consider whether due impartiality is being delivered across BBC content and that a breadth of voices and viewpoints are being reflected.”
Outgoing BBC chairman Richard Sharp, forced out after his close links with former prime minister Boris Johnson were revealed, said: “Madeleine Sumption and Samir Shah are well-known for their expert understanding of the issues involved in delivering impartial coverage of migration, which is an important and often intensely contested subject.
“Their combination of evidence-based academic research and working knowledge of impartiality in broadcasting make them highly qualified to lead the thematic review into BBC migration output.
“Their findings will ensure the BBC continues to have the correct approach to producing coverage that audiences can trust.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel