FORMER deputy prime minister Dominic Raab has resigned after an inquiry found he had acted in an “intimidating” and “aggressive” way with officials.
The 47-page report by Adam Tolley KC examined a number of incidents spanning the former minister’s tenure as foreign secretary, justice secretary and Brexit secretary.
But what were the allegations? And what was and wasn't upheld?
READ MORE: Dominic Raab resigns from Cabinet following bullying probe
‘Disciplinary threat’
Raab was accused of conveying a threat which had a “significant adverse effect” on a member of staff while working at the foreign office.
He was said to have suggested those involved on a project had breached the Civil Service Code.
Senior diplomat Sir Philip Barton gave evidence that he later had a “private meeting” with Raab to warn him not to threaten staff with the code. Raab disputed that the meeting had taken place.
Finding: Tolley found Raab had conveyed a threat and should have known his reference to the code would be perceived as such. He did not intend to threaten anyone with disciplinary action, but should have known how his comments would be interpreted.
‘Banging tables and hand-waving’
Colleagues alleged Raab’s “physical gestures” were used in a threatening way. Loud banging on tables and finger-pointing were among these complaints.
In one extreme case, he was said to have extended his hand towards someone’s face to stop them from talking.
Finding: Tolley found there was “scope for misunderstanding” and that the then-minister had not intended to be threatening.
‘Intimidating meetings’
While at the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Raab was said to have complained about a lack of “the basics” or “basic information”.
He was said to have been “intimidating” and “insulting” on a number of occasions in meetings.
Finding: Tolley found in the complainant’s favour. Raab displayed “unreasonably and persistently aggressive” conduct in a meeting. He made comments which were likely to “humiliate” and be interpreted as “unfairly personal criticism”, the report said.
READ MORE:
‘Perverse culture of fear’
A second group complaint at the MoJ described a “perverse culture of fear” and unreasonable work deadlines.
Finding: Tolley said the staff had “no ulterior agenda” but the nature of the evidence made it “unsuitable” grounds for a finding of fact
‘Shouting and swearing'
Raab was not found to have shouted or sworn at colleagues on any occasion.
‘Woeful’ and ‘useless’ insults
Raab claimed there was “cultural resistance” to his flagship Bill of Rights and policies on parole reform in the Ministry of Justice.
When frustrated that one of his “steers” about a proposed reform was not implemented, he was said to have described the work as “utterly useless” and “woeful”.
Finding: Tolley found in the favour of the complaint. He said: “On balance, I think that these were the words used; they comprised criticism that was not in the nature of constructive feedback. They were reasonably understood as insulting personal criticism."
Will Downing Street agree to a wider inquiry into ministerial bullying?
No, they've already ruled it out.
FDA general secretary Dave Penman had warned that misconduct by senior members of the UK Government is more widespread than Prime Minister Rishi Sunak wants to admit as he called for a wider probe into ministerial behaviour.
Penman, who made the call following Raab’s resignation, complained of the “inadequacy of a process that relies solely on the Prime Minister of the day to enforce standards”.
“This demonstrates that Raab is not just one bad apple, and there is a wider problem with ministerial bullying than the Prime Minister wants to admit,” he said.
READ MORE: Oliver Dowden made Deputy PM as Alex Chalk becomes Justice Secretary
The PM’s official spokesman said an independent inquiry into ministerial bullying was not being considered.
While a broader review is not being considered, he confirmed that Sunak had asked the Cabinet Office to look at how Government “can better learn to handle some of the issues that this report has raised, in terms of how concerns about working practices are raised in a timely manner and how they are dealt with”.
“I think that is in the interest of both civil servants and ministers.”
In his letter to Raab, Sunak told his former deputy that he believed there had been "shortcomings" in the bullying probe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here