A HOLYROOD committee has commissioned research to track changes in EU law.
Following Brexit, the Scottish Government committed to “keep pace” with EU laws in devolved areas to reduce regulatory issues and could allow for easier accession should Scotland become independent and seek membership of the bloc.
The Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee has asked Lisa Claire Whitten of Queen’s University Belfast to carry out the work – which will report twice a year.
READ MORE: Jenny Gilruth: SQA overhaul 'will not cause disruption'
Clare Adamson, the committee’s convener, said the research will help the committee scrutinise the Government’s attempts to maintain regulatory alignment as much as possible and allow businesses to “maintain awareness” of changes to EU laws.
“The UK, including Scotland, is no longer legally required to comply with EU law,” she said.
“But for many businesses in Scotland, being aware of EU legislation is crucial to meet the regulatory requirements of this significant export market."
The Motherwell and Wishaw SNP MSP added: “The Scottish Government made a commitment to keep pace with EU law and report regularly on this.
“But it is our job to scrutinise the extent to which this is happening. The research announced today will aid this scrutiny and help us as we examine the instances where the Scottish Government is, and indeed is not, keeping pace.”
Dr Whitten described the opportunity to carry out the research as “an honour”.
She added: “Since the end of the UK transition period in January 2021, I’ve been involved in a project that tracks changes in EU law that apply in Northern Ireland under the protocol/Windsor Framework.
“Doing so has yielded important insights into the evolving nature of, respectively, the EU and the UK legislative landscapes after Brexit.
“I am therefore delighted to be able to build on this work as I take forward the EU law tracker research on behalf of the Scottish Parliament.
“It is my intention, through this research, to help provide clarity and support scrutiny of the Scottish Government policy to alignment with EU law after Brexit.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel