MICHAEL Gove has claimed it was “wise” for the UK Government to block Scottish gender recognition reforms.
The Communities Secretary accused the Scottish Government of embarking on a “course of action that was folly” with the law change, which aimed to make it easier for one to change their gender on legal documents.
Appearing before the House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Gove said the law was now “pretty friendless”.
READ MORE: Ambulance service confirms 21 people in hospital after ship topples over
He said: “At the time there was a fair degree of pushback, but the collapse of both support for, and the case for, that legislation leads me to believe that this was a wise and proportionate intervention to defend women’s spaces, to defend the Equalities Act, and if it is the case that the victor in the current SNP leadership election, whoever that is, as first minister wants to bring forward this legislation, I would be very surprised.”
Leadership candidates Kate Forbes and Ash Regan have already indicated their opposition to the gender recognition Bill.
Regan resigned as a minister in protest against the legislation. Forbes was on maternity leave during the vote, but has since said she would have voted against the law.
READ MORE: Speaker red-faced after wrongly 'correcting' SNP leader's Brexit vote claim
Humza Yousaf is the only SNP leadership candidate who voted for the Bill, and he has pledged to fight the Section 35 order blocking the legislation in court.
Forbes has said she would look to amend the Bill, while Regan said she would put it to a citizens’ assembly if there was a desire to do so.
During Wednesday’s committee hearing, Gove also denied that the use of a Section 35 order represented a breakdown in relations between the UK and Scottish Governments.
He said: “I think it was the case that the Scottish Government, for reasons they must answer for, decided on a course of action that was folly.”
Asked whether the Government would take similar action on the beleaguered deposit return scheme, Gove said there were “no plans” to do so.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel