THE Scottish Tories have accused the SNP of trying to “shield the next first minister from scrutiny” by attempting to cancel next week’s FMQs.
First Minister’s Questions are held every Thursday at 12pm, and this coming session will be Nicola Sturgeon’s last at the front of the chamber.
With the next SNP leader set to be announced on Monday March 27 after the ballot closes at noon, they are set to be installed as FM on Tuesday, and then undertake their first session of FMQs on Thursday.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Minimum unit pricing among my proudest achievements
However, according to the Tories, at a meeting of party business managers on Tuesday afternoon, SNP MSP George Adam, the minister for parliamentary business, put the “unprecedented proposal” to Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone.
If successful, the next FM would not have had to face MSPs until Thursday, April 20.
The Tories allege Adam had to drop the request after “vehement opposition” from multiple parties.
The SNP said they would "take no lectures" from a Tory party who tried to shut down the Westminster parliament to avoid scrutiny, following the claims.
The Business Bureau is made up of representatives from each of the five Holyrood parties.
The Scottish Tory member, Alexander Burnett, MSP and chief whip, said it was a “shameful attempt” to hide the new FM from scrutiny, and dubbed it a “new low”.
He added: “Even for a party as obsessed as the SNP are with secrecy and spin.
“It was an outrageous affront to democracy that Nationalist business managers even attempted this stunt.
“This was totally unprecedented and unacceptable – every new First Minister or Prime Minister has faced parliamentary scrutiny whenever their first FMQs or PMQs has happened to fall.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf says Kate Forbes and Ash Regan will 'lose SNP support'
Burnett said the “cowardly move” was indicative of the “current state” of the party, following resignations over the weekend by chief communications boss Murray Foote and chief executive Peter Murrell over a row about membership figures.
Burnett continued: “The leadership election has revealed a party in the grip of a civil war.
“The candidates have been kicking lumps out of each other, trashing Nicola Sturgeon’s record and questioning the integrity of the election itself, while the SNP’s chief executive and top spin doctor have resigned for lying to the media and party members.
“The new First Minister may not want to face the music over this carnage at FMQs but it’s part of the job – and the SNP have been forced to accept he or she can’t be hidden away.”
When Sturgeon took over the top job from Alex Salmond in 2014, she undertook FMQs the following day, the Tories added.
An SNP spokesperson said: "We’ll take no lectures from a Tory party which not so long ago illegally shut down the Commons to dodge scrutiny.
"Whoever becomes First Minister will be more than happy to face questions at Holyrood every week."
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson said: “The Parliament does not comment on Bureau discussions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel