THE BBC presenter Fiona Bruce is facing criticism for saying that an allegation of domestic violence levelled against Stanley Johnson by his ex-wife was “a one-off”.
Bruce made the comments on Question Time during a discussion about whether Boris Johnson’s nomination of his father for a knighthood was appropriate.
At one point, journalist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown said that Stanley Johnson was a “wife beater”.
However, Bruce intervened to say that while Stanley Johnson’s ex-wife Charlotte had told a journalist that her husband had broken her nose, friends of Johnson said it was “a one-off”.
Now, Bruce’s role as an ambassador for domestic violence charity Refuge is being called into question by those who felt her comments on Stanley Johnson were inappropriate.
Labour MP Kate Osborne said that Bruce’s comments were “disgraceful”.
She tweeted: “#InternationalWomensDay this week and #bbcqt Fiona Bruce trivialises violence against women: Stanley Johnson’s friends say 'it was a one off' that he broke his wife’s nose.
“Disgraceful. DV [domestic violence] is rarely a one off – no quote of the reality from Charlotte Fawcett 'he hit me many times'."
SNP MP John Nicolson said that Bruce had shown “shockingly bad judgement” by intervening in the manner she did.
He said: “Extraordinary moment on BBC Question Time last night. Stanley Johnson broke his wife’s nose @y_alibhai reminds audience.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes: I won't change or expand abortion law in Scotland
“Fiona Bruce intervenes with context concluding 'it was a one off'.
“Live telly can be pressurising but this is shockingly bad judgement from the chair.”
Twitter commentator Julie Street added: "I'm still absolutely sickened that as of 3pm today Fiona Bruce is still in post both at the BBC and as a Refuge ambassador."
Another added: "As an ambassador for Refuge how is she not accountable?"
Refuge issues statement amid Fiona Bruce row
Refuge issued a statement on Friday afternoon after the concerns were raised.
"Refuge’s position is clear – domestic abuse is never a ‘one off’, it is a pattern of behaviour that can manifest in a number of ways, including physical abuse," they said. "Domestic abuse is never acceptable."
They went on: "We have spoken to Fiona today, and she is appalled that any of her words have been understood as her minimising domestic violence. We know she is deeply upset that this has been triggering for survivors.
"Like the host of any BBC programme, when serious on-air allegations are made about someone, Fiona is obliged to put forward a right of reply from that person or their representatives, and that was what happened last night. These are not in any way Fiona’s own views about the situation.
"Refuge has a long history of working with Fiona, who has been an active supporter of ours for some 25 years, and continually uses her profile to campaign publicly against domestic abuse, and to advocate for survivors.
"Fiona is deeply sorry that last night’s programme has distressed survivors of domestic abuse. Refuge stands by her and all survivors today.
"We continue to be appreciative of all the work Fiona does on behalf of Refuge and recognise the immense contribution she has made to our work to end domestic abuse and challenge violence against women and girls."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel