A HIGHLAND hotel director has responded to anger after a restaurant in one of his three-star venues charged £25 for a fish supper.
The Kylesku boutique hotel on the popular NC500 route had charged nearly £50 for two cod and chip dinners, with a photo of the diners’ receipt being shared widely online.
Ullapool Craic, a local tourist guide, shared it and accused the firm of “charging extortionate prices for mediocre food”.
The cost for the two dishes was similar to a three-course meal at Tom Kitchin’s Michelin-starred Edinburgh restaurant, which would set customers back £52.50.
A word of warning to visitors to the Highlands. Kylesku Hotel used to have a reputation for good seafood and welcome. Sadly has been bought out by a company trying to franchise the NC500 and now charging extortionate prices for mediocre food. Please don't be ripped off like this. pic.twitter.com/VTYmQMytdm
— Ullapool (@UllapoolCraic) March 1, 2023
On Tripadvisor, other guests had raised concerns over the cost of food in the hotel.
“The lovely setting/restaurant didn’t justify having to pay £35 for a very small starter-sized portion of venison haunch,” commented one traveller.
“The food was tasty, however we left hungry after paying over £74 for 2 small meals and a coke.”
David Whiteford, the director of Highland Coast Hotels which owns Kylesku, acknowledged a “mistake” had been made after the receipt image blew up online.
“I’ll be the first to admit we got it wrong,” he said.
“We are in a remote part of Scotland, so everything is expensive up there.
“Our mantra is to create a great experience for our guests and really show great value for money. On this occasion, I don’t think we achieved that.”
READ MORE: 8 North Coast 500 tips you should know before heading on your epic roadtrip
Whiteford added that the fish was “probably about six quid too expensive”, suggesting that the menu would be revised to bring the cost under £20 per fish supper.
A spokesperson for VisitScotland called on businesses to consider value for money when creating hospitality experiences.
“We know that rising costs are having an impact on some businesses and on occasion this may result in an increase in the price visitors are paying,” they said.
“While we cannot directly influence the amount that providers may change, we would urge businesses to consider that value for money plays a hugely important part in the overall visitor experience.
“We want to create a legacy that will see visitors return year after year.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel