THE man tasked with leading an investigation into the appointment of Tory donor Richard Sharp as the BBC chair has dropped out.
William Shawcross, the commissioner for public appointments, had been due to examine whether the process which saw the Boris Johnson ally handed the top role at the broadcaster was up to standard.
However, reports in the press highlighted his extremely close ties to Rishi Sunak’s Downing Street, where his daughter heads up the policy unit.
READ MORE: Who is William Shawcross? The head of the probe into BBC chair Richard Sharp
In a letter published on the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments website on Monday, Shawcross announced he would step back from leading the probe.
He claimed he had made the decision because he had “met Mr Sharp on previous occasions”.
Shawcross went on: “I have decided to recuse myself from this particular investigation. I will be delegating my powers as Commissioner under the 2019 Order in Council to an independent person who will be appointed by my office for this one investigation.
“They will have sole responsibility and will be supported by my officials.”
He added that he would continue in all his other responsiblities as commissioner for public appointments.
It comes after The Sunday Times revealed that Sharp had facilitated a loan to the then-Tory leader Johnson before his appointment to the top BBC role in 2021.
He had connected Johnson with Sam Blyth, a multimillionaire Canadian businessman who acted as guarantor for a loan of £800,000 to the disgraced former prime minister.
Sharp has also asked the nominations committee of the BBC’s board to look at the matter.
He has previously donated more than £400,000 to the Tory Party.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel