ALBA’S Westminster leader will attempt to bring forward a bill this week to give powers for a Scottish independence referendum to Holyrood.
Neale Hanvey MP has secured the opportunity to introduce the Scotland (Self Determination) Bill in the House of Commons on Wednesday.
It is being brought under a rule which allows a backbench MP to make a case for a new bill in a speech lasting up to 10 minutes. The Ten-Minute Rule Bills are unlikely to become law but are a way of drawing attention to an issue.
Hanvey will propose amending the Scotland Act 1998 to transfer the Section 30 power from Westminster to Holyrood which can enable an independence referendum to be held.
The Alba MP said it was vital to “use every avenue” to assert Scotland’s right to determine its own future.
He said: “The decision to legislate for an independence referendum should rest with Holyrood not Westminster.
"That is why I am bringing forward this bill to assert the right of the Scottish people to self determination, and to remind the UK Government that, however much they may argue to the contrary, it is the Scottish people who are sovereign, in the Scottish constitutional tradition of popular sovereignty.
“In presenting this bill I am taking the fight for Scottish democracy, for our right as a nation to determine our own future, to the heart of Westminster
“The bill transfers the Section 30 power, in the Scotland Act 1998, to legislate for a Scottish independence referendum, from Westminster to the Scottish Parliament.
“It is not a bill in favour of independence per se but rather about the Scottish people’s right to choose their own constitutional future.
READ MORE: Daily Telegraph attempts to clear Prince Andrew's name with front page
“Therefore it is one which every democrat should support regardless of their view on independence.”
The proposed bill says that the power to legislate for a referendum may only be exercised where the Scottish public has demonstrated its support for the holding of such a vote.
It also says that no such referendum may be held sooner than seven years after the previous such referendum.
Hanvey added: “At this important juncture in Scotland’s constitutional journey it is vital that the Yes movement and all independence supporting MSPs and MPs continue to assert Scotland’s right to determine our own future and to use every avenue open to them to do so.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel