RISHI Sunak is facing a growing rebellion from big names in his Tory Party over his ban on new onshore wind farms.
The Prime Minister is facing calls from his two successors – Liz Truss and Boris Johnson – as well as from COP26 president Alok Sharma to lift the moratorium on new onshore windfarms.
Sharma, Johnson, and Truss have all backed an amendment to Government legislation in an attempt to lift the ban.
The COP26 president's support means that Simon Clarke’s amendment to the Levelling Up Bill now has the public backing of 22 Tory MPs.
READ MORE: Flatpack wind turbine invented by 15-year-old Scot to help communities in Kenya
Sharma said he supports letting “local communities decide”, backing residents being given reduced energy bills in exchange for their support of new developments.
“Onshore wind is one of the cheapest forms of renewable power and will help to bolster the UK’s energy security,” he tweeted.
“Putin’s illegal and brutal war in Ukraine has reinforced that climate & environmental security are totally interlinked with energy and national security.
“Faster deployment of renewables, inc onshore wind, is needed to deliver on the UK’s 2035, 100% clean electricity target.”
The Prime Minister is facing a major challenge over planning policy from within the Conservative Party on multiple fronts.
He was forced to pull a vote on the legislation that would set a target of building 300,000 homes per year when around 50 Tory MPs threatened to rebel.
Johnson did not seek to overturn the effective moratorium on new onshore wind projects, in place since 2015, during his time as prime minister.
Truss planned to lift the restrictions on new onshore wind in England, but her ambition came to an end along with her short time in No 10.
Clarke, who has penned the amendment in a bid to force Sunak's hand, is a close ally of Truss and served as her levelling up secretary.
Labour leader Keir Starmer backs lifting the ban, arguing that Sunak’s refusal to do so as a “national act of self-harm, choking off our economic potential”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel