Hello and welcome to the year 2052.
Sea levels have risen so dramatically that a cul-de-sac in northern Kirkcaldy has just been announced as Scotland’s new capital city.
Lurpak is now a high-value tradable commodity and helps shore up our new currency.
Citizens burn £50 notes to generate enough heat to boil water for their weekly cup of tea.
Breakfast programmes have been replaced with a daily report streamed across all channels entitled "Crisis Watch: How Bad Will Today Be?".
UK Ministers have stacked their red boxes and a few broken Downing Street wine fridges against the No10 door to try and keep out looters.
Liz Truss has thus far evaded capture and is still on the run.
Meanwhile, at Holyrood, a silver-haired Douglas Ross is talking about ferry contracts again.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says Douglas Ross 'making things up' in heated clash over ferries
I get it, I do.
It’s an important issue, made topical again by the recent episode of BBC Disclosure: The Great Ferries Scandal.
Douglas Ross has returned to the subject at FMQs time and time again, trying to get answers from the Scottish Government.
I just wish he could have condensed his questions into one session so we could move on to the cost-of-living crisis, the energy crisis, the financial crisis and all the other associated crises.
Anyway, it’s not my job to tell the Scottish Tory leader what to do. That’s the Prime Minister’s job. So I’ll stick to a recap of ferries FMQs.
All aboard the Good Ship Groundhog Day, where Douglas Ross (above) accuses Nicola Sturgeon’s government of a "cover up" in how ferry contracts were awarded.
"Fergusons were the only bidder given access to a 424-page cheat sheet on how to build ferries. They received a confidential, in-person meeting with people involved in buying the ferries. They were the only bidder allowed to re-submit with a new design.
"So why did they get special treatment?" he asked.
Nicola Sturgeon said that ministers were not aware of any impropriety in the procurement process and they were not involved in the process or privy to exchanges between CMAL and bidders.
"However, the allegations in the BBC Disclosure programme are serious allegations. I asked the Permanent Secretary to engage with Audit Scotland earlier this week about further investigation and I welcome the confirmation from Audit Scotland that they will be looking at the substance of these allegations", she said.
Douglas Ross hit back saying the only conclusion that any reasonable person could draw is that the deal was rigged.
Well I’m an unreasonable person and I think FMQs is rigged to be as dull as humanely possible.
READ MORE: Why were Holyrood's party leaders wearing heart-shaped badges at FMQs?
We’re probably only a few weeks away from the next Ferries FMQs, when Audit Scotland releases the outcome of its investigation and Nicola Sturgeon and Douglas Ross selectively pick out quotes to read to each other that they say prove the other is wrong.
Halloween in the chamber is going to interesting this year when the Scottish Tory leader dresses up as a half-built ferry to spook Nicola Sturgeon and she returns the favour by dressing up as a YouGov poll showing Scottish voting intentions.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel