LABOUR is set to debate whether or not to commit to changing the Westminster voting system at its party conference.
Sir Keir Starmer has already suggested electoral reform is not a priority of his. When he was asked if the party would make electoral reform a manifesto commitment ahead of the next election, he said: “No, it’s not a priority for me.”
However, a motion calling for the party to commit to introducing proportional representation (PR) for general elections in place of first-past-the-post (FPTP) has made it onto the party's conference agenda and is set for debate on Monday.
PR is the idea that seats in a parliament or legislature should reflect the number of votes cast and is used at Holyrood and in Scottish local government elections.
The motion reads: "Labour must make a commitment to introduce proportional representation for general elections in the next manifesto.”
It is expected the debate will be held sometime between 2.40 pm and 4.35 pm, with a vote scheduled for approximately 5.50 pm.
Labour's former shadow chancellor John McDonnell has already said he will be backing the proposal, as has former leader Jeremy Corbyn, and has accused Starmer of acting like a monarch over the party's policy on electoral reform.
READ MORE: Pound falls to all-time low against US Dollar
At the conference in Liverpool, McDonnell said policy decisions were taken democratically and "no one is above that".
However, conference motions are not binding and, although Starmer has previously shown support for electoral reform, as Labour leader he has been more sceptical about the idea and there is no immediate prospect of the party taking on the policy, according to the Observer.
At last year's conference, about 80% of constituency party delegates voted in favour of embracing PR, but the motion was defeated after 95% of votes from affiliates, almost entirely unions, opposed the move.
Three of the biggest five unions linked to Labour - Unite, Unison and CWU - have now changed their stance and back the idea.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel