A YES-SUPPORTING Moray councillor who lived and worked in the Netherlands and Denmark has insisted Scotland can learn a lot from the two countries if it becomes independent.
Draeyk Van Der Horn, below, who is a Green councillor for Forres, said he welcomed the Scottish Government’s initial paper in its new prospectus for an independent Scotland.
The 72-page “scene setter” released last month puts the UK against 10 “comparator countries” which frequently outperform it across areas such as income equality and poverty rates.
The Netherlands and Denmark are referenced in the paper, with both coming out as wealthier than the UK in 2020 based on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per head.
READ MORE: Indyref2: Yes AHEAD in new poll on support for Scottish independence
They also boasted lower poverty rates with fewer deprived children and pensioners, higher life expectancy and higher average wages, while Denmark had significantly better social mobility – the movement of people within or between social strata in society.
In the UK, analysis found it would take on average five generations for those born in low-income families to approach the mean income in the UK. Denmark, meanwhile, was assessed as achieving this change within two generations.
Van Der Horn studied in the Netherlands and worked there years later as a chef, while he has also lived in Denmark, making the most of the opportunities presented by the UK being part of the EU before Brexit.
He said he noticed how people on low incomes were better supported in both countries in comparison to the UK while people living there had different outlooks.
“There was a good amount of support for people on reduced incomes and that came across the board for people who were minorities or marginalised,” said Van Der Horn.
“If you’re disabled in Denmark or Holland, I think you get a lot more support than you do in the UK, and the same for people with long-term illnesses.
“Things are better around gender equality as well. There was much more equanimity between the parents in raising children and more community support around it.
“I think there is more support in these smaller countries because they value that they are a smaller country with less population.
“There is definitely a different state of mind when you come from a smaller country. The politicians are closer to their constituents and with decisions that are made, you’re just aware those are going to affect your neighbours much more clearly than if you’re in a large country.
“There are a lot of things Scotland would like to be able to do like this – but it can’t because of the attachment to the UK Government.”
The aim of the first paper in what will be a series of documents making a fresh case for independence was to prove the proof is in the pudding – if these nations of a similar size to Scotland can thrive as independent nations, then why can’t Scotland?
Van Der Horn said he was delighted to see these comparisons being drawn, as he sees it as vital Scotland takes inspiration from other nations.
He added: “I believe Scotland can learn a lot from places like the Netherlands and Denmark. I think having the option as a smaller country to be able to more clearly define priorities is key.
“And hopefully in rejoining the EU, that will be important because we will have our own seat. We won’t be hanging on the coattails of London and that will be a huge difference in terms of being able to drive change across the continent.
“This paper is great because it immediately says to people, if Denmark can stand on its own two feet, then why can’t we?
“We’ve embraced things like proportional representation in Scotland – that’s delivered better democracy. Those are things that exist in Denmark too, so Scotland has got a bit of these more progressive things already, but can’t get more because we’re still tied up with Westminster.
“There is a narrative that has been popularised by Westminster that somehow Scotland is like a little region rather than a nation. So highlighting that we’ve got more or less the same population as Denmark, and outlining their success, I think makes sense to people.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel