EDINBURGH Labour have been dismissed as “a mess” by one of the SNP’s new councillors in the capital, after the first council meeting of the term adjourned after only eight minutes with no administration in place.
The first full meeting of Edinburgh’s 63 councillors following this month’s local elections would normally have confirmed a new council leader and depute leader, as well as electing a new Lord Provost and appointing councillors to various roles on boards and committees.
However, the meeting came to a speedy end after both SNP group leader Adam McVey and Labour group leader Cammy Day requested that proceedings be delayed until 26 May, allowing further time for ongoing coalition negotiations to conclude.
READ MORE: Glasgow's new Labour leader 'in Spain' for first council vote
While the move was not opposed by any members, Marco Biagi, the SNP’s newly elected councillor for Colinton/Fairmilehead, later tweeted: “Labour are a mess, walking away from the natural option of continuing a centre-left partnership with the SNP that has been working for ten years, because their group is too divided to continue it.”
Labour councillor Scott Arthur voiced criticism of the SNP, writing on social media: “Despite the talk of mandates, Edinburgh’s biggest party failed to table plans to lead the Council and the meeting was adjourned after just eight minutes.”
Speaking to the National, Arthur added: “There is nothing centre-left about the cuts the SNP is imposing on councils in Scotland.
“Edinburgh is Scotland's worst funded council, and our capital needs an administration committed to resolving that.
"The SNP have messed up their chance of forming an administration, and I hope that next week Labour will be able to provide the leadership Edinburgh needs.”
SNP group leader Adam McVey struck a more diplomatic note, telling the National: “All parties agreed to defer council appointments. We’re continuing to have formal discussions with the Greens to look to form a new administration.
"There is a lot we agree on, and most our policies are also supported by other parties in the council.
“Edinburgh needs to have a clear way forward to deal with the cost of-living crisis facing so many of our residents, as well as making our capital greener and fairer as well as improving local services for residents.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon calls out Anas Sarwar over Labour's 'backroom deals' with Tories
While Labour and the SNP have run Edinburgh’s local authority together for much of the past decade, that possibility was seemingly ruled out by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar ahead of May’s local elections, when he declared that the party would not enter into any formal coalitions.
The SNP and the Scottish Greens this week began negotiations to form a minority administration in the capital, having what McVey has described as “constructive discussions about how we can work together to implement the policies that we campaigned for and that our residents voted for.”
According to Arthur, the Edinburgh Labour group will “table a plan to take forward our capital” next week, but no details of that plan have yet been made public.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here