The Alba Party remains “undaunted” despite failing to have any councillors elected in Scotland, Alex Salmond has said.
The party put up 111 candidates, a number of whom were elected as SNP councillors in 2017 before defecting to Salmond’s party when it launched last year.
But none of the candidates managed to gain a seat in any of Scotland’s 32 local authorities, the same fate that befell the party at last year’s Holyrood election.
Among those to lose their seat was Chris McEleny, the party’s general secretary.
READ MORE: Alba's Chris McEleny loses seat in Inverclyde
Speaking on Friday, Salmond said: “Our 111 candidates fought a fine campaign and our vote registered everywhere.
“In a number of wards the Alba vote came in at over 5%, but the instruction from the SNP leadership not to use preferences to support other independence candidates now condemns most Scottish councils to control by unionists.
“However, the awareness of Alba is much, much greater than previously. We found people friendly and receptive to the Alba message but still to be convinced about the vote.
“Alba is undaunted and will continue to press hard on the urgency of independence.
“It was Alba pressure which brought discussion on the timing of an independence ballot to the fore in this election.
“In the event of the promised referendum next year, our party will unite with others behind the Yes campaign.
“If, however, it does not take place then, the SNP will reap the electoral whirlwind in coming elections.
“Alba is also focused primarily on the tactic of maximising the pro-independence votes at Holyrood and the next Holyrood poll is our number one target.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel