REMAINING in the UK is “economically high-risk” for Scotland, the former SNP MSP who chaired the Sustainable Growth Commission has warned.
In a new article, former SNP MSP Andrew Wilson – who served in Holyrood between 1999 and 2003 – has explained Scotland would be the richest nation ever to vote for its independence if it were to do so.
Writing in the magazine Perspective, he outlined the positives of leaving the UK and rejoining the EU, but acknowledged there would be “challenges” in rejoining the bloc.
The former politician cautioned against a post-independence austerity programme and instead said the Scottish Government should invest in the transition to net-zero and recovery from Covid-19.
“It stands to reason that if Brexit is problematic for Britain’s trade, then Scotland returning to the EU will create challenges,” Wilson wrote. “The difference of course is that if Brexit is a choice to exit the benefits of the single market, independence would be a choice to return to them.
“Transitional challenges will therefore be about benefits sought rather than departed from in Brexit.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon confident of Yes victory in 2023 independence referendum
“Scots have the choice of independence and a return to the European Union. Not choosing that would be economically high-risk.
“The process will not be simple; it will be hard work and take effort, but, like most acts of self-improvement, it will also be satisfying and meaningful.
“Of course it will be challenging, but it will be worth it.”
Ensuring independence is successful, Wilson added, will depend largely on decisions made after separation, but the issue for voters will be if Scotland is more likely to make good economic decisions as an independent country than the UK Government would be able to on its behalf.
“If Scotland makes bad choices the country won’t achieve its potential,” he wrote.
“The question is whether it’s more likely to get the policy mix right on its own than as part of the UK, with a government it doesn’t support.
“Policies it would make as an independent country include a pro-migration stance agreed across all the parties in Scotland, in contrast to the approach of the UK Home Office.
“The economic imperative for this in Scotland is clear, as is political consent.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel