NADINE Dorries has never been one to inspire confidence in her ability to grasp the details.
The Culture Secretary made headlines for all the wrong reasons after she begun floating plans for the privatisation of Channel 4.
Dorries said she would argue that the future of the broadcaster shouldn’t be scrutinised “just because it’s in receipt of public money”.
You might expect the person literally in charge of media for the Tory government to know that Channel 4 is not in receipt of public money. You might.
READ MORE: Nadine Dorries says 'Leftie lynch mob' behind outrage over Channel 4 sale
Proving that her lack of knowledge on the topic of broadcasting in the UK is boundless, Dorries has made another pretty similar error.
Speaking to LBC on Thursday, the top Tory pointed to how well Channel 5 has done since “they were privatised a small number of years ago, three years ago, five years ago maybe”.
The reason Dorries struggled to remember exactly how many years ago Channel 5 was privatised may have something to do with the fact it never happened.
As a quick Google would have told her, Channel 5 was launched as a private broadcaster in 1997 and has never been publicly owned.
In making the case for selling Channel 4, Nadine Dorries points to the success of Channel 5's privatisation, not once, but twice. Channel 5 has never been owned by the government. pic.twitter.com/Ru927I9dO7
— Jake Kanter (@Jake_Kanter) April 28, 2022
It was bought from its owner Richard Desmond by American firm Paramount Global in 2014, but that can’t have been what she meant, can it?
Either way, Dorries’s mistake wasn’t a one-off. She doubled down on her statement, a wry look suggesting she thought she was making a fine point.
“I call Channel 5 the levelling-up broadcaster,” she said to absolutely no applause.
SNP MP John Nicolson said Dorres displayed an “extraordinary level of ignorance for a Cabinet minister speaking about her own brief”.
The only question left to ask is: why are any of us surprised?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel