DAMAGE to part of a Roman fort that formed part of the Antonine Wall could be the result of illegal metal detecting.
Historic Environment Scotland (HES) said it is working with police after reports that a large number of holes have been dug at Bar Hill Fort, which forms part of the Antonine Wall Unesco world heritage site.
Many significant Roman artefacts have been discovered at the fort, which is more than 2000 years old and formed part of the north-western frontier of the Roman Empire.
It is protected as a scheduled monument, meaning metal detecting and the removal of items from the site is illegal without prior consent and is subject to prosecution.
READ MORE: Expert claims Hadrian built on existing Anglo-Scots defences
HES said the site in East Dunbartonshire has been damaged by what appears to be illegal metal detecting for the fifth time in 12 months.
Stefan Sagrott, senior cultural resources adviser at HES, said: “Such incidents of metal detecting, whether on our estate or in the wider historic environment, can cause irreparable damage to archaeological sites and impair investigation of them, potentially robbing us of our history.
“These incidents also divert resources away from vital conservation work to our sites and monuments.
“Heritage crime is a serious matter and we are committed to investigating incidents thoroughly and pursuing offenders to ensure that Scotland’s historic environment is protected.
“We would urge any members of the public with any information regarding this incident to get in touch with HES at hmenquiries@hes.scot; contact Police Scotland on 101; or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111 or online at crimestoppers-uk.org."
READ MORE: Boris Johnson's bogus claim about Roman Empire rubbished by historians
Metal detecting is only permitted at sites in the care of HES when it is part of an authorised archaeological research project under supervision of the organisation’s in-house archaeologists.
Bar Hill Fort was one of 16 known forts along the Antonine Wall, which was built across Scotland’s central belt from AD 140.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel