The manner in which children are taught to read in England is in need of urgent reform, more than 250 experts have said in a letter to the Government.
According to research, led by academics from UCL, England’s teachers now focus more on teaching children how to read by blending sounds together – known as synthetic phonics – than on reading and enjoying whole texts.
The UCL researchers have joined more than 250 signatories of an open letter calling on the UK Government to change its policy on reading.
In the letter they demand that reforms “centre on a wider range of approaches to teaching phonics and reading, enabling teachers to use their own judgement about which is best for their pupils”.
It adds that children should learn phonics as part of reading whole texts, and that teachers should be enabled to use their own judgment to decide what is best for pupils.
Co-author Professor Dominic Wyse, head of the Department of Learning and Leadership at UCL’s Institute of Education, said teaching children to read is “crucial” to improving their life chances.
“Teaching children to read and to make sense of texts is crucial to improving their life chances and is one of the most important tasks of primary schools and early years settings,” he said.
“Although there are some strengths to England’s current approach to teaching reading, our new research shows that the Government’s policy is uninformed because it is not underpinned by the latest robust evidence.
“For the first time in more than 100 years we see that a balanced instruction approach to the teaching of reading is no longer the norm in England.”
Prof Wyse said teachers are now more frequently using the “narrower” synthetic phonics approach.
“Our view is that the system doesn’t give teachers enough flexibility to do what they think is best for their pupils, nor to encourage pupils to enjoy reading,” he added.
The research found that 66% of 634 teachers who answered a question on the subject replied that synthetic phonics was their main focus compared with 1% (nine) who said they focused on whole texts.
The phonics screening check, given to Year 2 pupils, proved very unpopular with teachers surveyed by the study.
Some 935 out of 936 written comments from the teacher survey were negative about the test.
Commenting on UCL’s paper about the Government’s approach to the teaching of reading, Julie McCulloch, director of policy at the Association of School and College Leaders, said it was important that phonics was combined with helping children to develop a love of reading.
“There is clear evidence that synthetic phonics provides a strong foundation to help children to learn to read,” she said.
“But it is important that this is combined with approaches which help children to appreciate stories and develop a love of reading.
In a statement, the Department for Education defended the use of phonics in teaching children how to read.
A department spokesperson said: “We are committed to raising literacy standards by following the evidence. Systematic phonics teaching has been proven the world over to be the most effective method of teaching children to read.
“Since the introduction of the phonics screening check in 2012, the percentage of Year 1 pupils meeting the expected standard in reading has risen from 58% to 82%, with 92% of children achieving this standard by Year 2.
“In line with the evidence, our guidance on reading makes clear that phonics is just one part of becoming a fluent reader. As well as systematic phonics teaching, teachers should also focus on speaking and reading stories to foster a love of reading among children.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here