PRO-BEIJING candidates have dominated Hong Kong's legislative elections, beating moderates and independents in the city's first public poll after China passed a resolution to ensure that only "patriots" could run the city.
Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam said during a news conference on Monday she was "satisfied" with the election, despite a 30.2% voter turnout - the lowest since the British handed Hong Kong over to China in 1997.
She said that the number of registered voters reached 92.5%, a record high compared to the 2012 and 2016 elections, when around 70% of voters had registered.
"For registered voters, deciding whether they want to exercise their voting rights in a particular election is entirely a matter for themselves," she said.
"In this election, 1.35 million voters cast their votes. They did not just return candidates of their choice to LegCo (Hong Kong's Legislative Council), and I think it was also because of their support for the improved electoral system."
Under the new laws, the number of directly elected legislators was reduced from 35 to 20, even as the legislature was expanded from 70 to 90 seats. Most of the legislators were appointed by largely pro-Beijing bodies, ensuring that they make up the majority of the legislature.
All candidates were also vetted by a largely pro-Beijing committee before they could be nominated.
Lam said that even if there was a high turnout rate based on "poor politics", such as the political polarisation during the period of political strife in 2019, that is "not something we should be glad to have".
The opposition camp has criticised the elections, with the largest pro-democracy party, the Democratic Party, fielding no candidates for the first time since the 1997 handover.
Lam said she expects that work with the 90 legislators would continue to be "very exciting" because they have different opinions on many social issues.
She is expected to travel to Beijing later on Monday on a duty-reporting trip, which she says is to give a full account to Beijing on the latest political and economic situation in Hong Kong.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here