ALL the money wasted on the “abysmal, sleazy” PPE procurement could have been spent instead on maintaining the £20-a-week uplift in Universal Credit, according to a legal campaign group.
The cut is expected to push millions of people across the UK into crisis, with many forced to choose between eating and heating.
It also means the benefit is worth less in real terms in 2021 than it was when it was first introduced in 2013.
The uplift was introduced by the UK Government to help people weather the pandemic and there has been a widespread outcry over its withdrawal at the start of this month.
The Good Law Project’s Jo Maugham hit out at the Government’s priorities.
READ MORE: What difference did the Universal Credit uplift make for those who needed it?
He said: “If the cupboard is bare it is because £8 billion was wasted spending huge sums of money giving contracts overwhelmingly to those with Conservative Party connections, and the losers – as they always are under the Conservative Party – are families in the direst need.”
National Audit figures show aggregate spend on PPE to deal with the pandemic was £12.5bn. Five years’ worth of supply was bought at five times the normal rate due to increased pandemic prices.
However, prices have returned to normal, meaning that the UK Government bought at least four years’ worth of PPE at the inflated rate of £2.5bn per year instead of £0.5bn, according to the Good Law Project.
“The situation is slightly worse than that actually because in addition to spending those super-high prices, we are ‘spaffing’ enormous ongoing sums on storing all the PPE and because we bought it all in a great hurry a lot of it is unusable,” said Maugham.
“We’ve spent around £2bn on unusable PPE and a lot of what we bought has a shelf life shorter than five years so we will never be able to use it. This means that theestimate drawn from National Audit Office figures of £8bn is likely to be conservative.”
He added: “The money wasted on this abysmal, sleazy PPE procurement represents at least two years of additional Universal Credit payment to the poorest families in the country.
“They are the losers while the big winners are donors to the Conservative Party who were the VIP beneficiaries of so much of this spending.”
Maugham pointed out that Westminster’s Public Accounts Committee had also said the £37bn spent on Test and Trace had made no discernible difference in slowing the spread of coronavirus.
“And just as with PPE, there was a VIP lane for Test and Trace bidders and many of them came in because of their political connections to the Conservative Party,” said Maugham.
The Good Law Project has now launched a petition to recover the money “wasted on duff PPE” which has already reached 48,000 signatures, with a target of 50,000.
READ MORE: Voices from the frontline respond to Universal Credit cut
It reads: “Companies shouldn’t be able to walk away with hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money when they failed to deliver.
“This money should be in the public purse, not lining the pockets of the well-connected.
“It’s time to put an end to the Covid-19 goldrush.
“Government must conduct a full review of the companies that did not deliver adequate PPE and recover the profits from those who benefitted.”
You can add your name to the petition via the group’s website at goodlawproject.org or directly at https://glplive.org/tsn-ppe-0810
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel