NICOLA Sturgeon has picked apart a claim from a Labour MSP that Scotland should not be using public money to plan for indyref2 at a time when emergency services across the country are in “meltdown”.
The First Minister was responding to a question from Scottish Labour’s Alex Rowley, one of only two of the party’s MSPs not to sit on its shadow frontbench.
Rowley had dismissed arguments about “the impact of failed Tory austerity” and Covid before saying: “The one thing that is absolutely clear is that much of our public services across Scotland are in meltdown.”
He went on: “Therefore, how can the First Minister possibly justify using government resources, taxpayers’ money, on working up proposals for an independence referendum at a time when surely the whole of the Scottish Government, the whole of this parliament, should be focused on addressing the emergency that we have in our public services?”
READ MORE: Douglas Ross 'deliberately making 400,000 Scots families poorer'
Rowley’s attack line is the same as that recently used by Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, who claimed that by preparing for indyref2 the SNP had its “priorities wrong”.
In response, the First Minister issued a withering attack on the Tory government in London and those who would stand in the way of Scots’ right to choose a different future.
She said: “I don’t think we can argue about the impact of UK Government austerity on services the length and breadth of Scotland. It has been utterly devastating.
"And the problem is that unless we do something about it, to get ourselves out of the grip of Tory government after Tory government, people across Scotland are going to suffer more.
“Just this week we’ve seen a National Insurance increase that will punish the lowest paid in our society…”
At this point grumbles could be heard, presumably from the Tory benches where arguments have focused on the extra money the “regressive” National Insurance hike will raise, rather than the impact of the rise on society’s least well off.
Responding to that, Sturgeon went on: “We all want to see extra money for public services, but raising that money in a way that punishes the poor is the bit that frankly we don’t agree with and nobody should agree with if they care about these issues.
“We’re also about to see from this UK Government the biggest overnight cut to social security since the 1930s as they take away the £20 per week uplift to Universal Credit.
“This may be something that Alex Rowley and I disagree on and he can explain it to his constituents but I do think it’s right that people in Scotland get the opportunity to choose a different future, to choose a better future where we take control over social security and how we raise our funds into this parliament, so we don’t have to stand here and, to use his phrase, argue about the impact of another government on people the length and breadth of Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel