NICOLA Sturgeon hit out at Douglas Ross over his party's "infantile" opposition politics during a row over vaccine passports.
The exchange came in the first FMQs of the parliamentary term, with the First Minister taking the Tory leader to task early in the session.
Ross had initially asked if the Scottish Government's ministerial team agreed with the implementation of covid vaccine certification, to which Nicola Sturgeon said that it was for Parliament to decide on the policy.
A debate on whether or not the will be introduced is scheduled for Parliament next week.
READ MORE: Covid in Scotland: Vaccine passports dependant on length of crisis
Ross said: "The First Minister refused to say if they agreed at the time of her announcement if they supported vaccine passports, it seems the coalition of chaos which the First Minister described as a leap of faith earlier on this week is already a leap into the dark for the greens.
"But they’re not the only people in Scotland who have no idea how vaccine passports are going to work.
"Hospitality groups say the lack of engagement is extremely concerning. Scottish Football clubs have warned the SNP’s plans are completely unworkable. Industry groups need answers about this scheme before her government introduces it, why haven’t they had that chance?"
The First Minister said: "Firstly, perhaps Douglas Ross should first and foremost concentrate on what his view on vaccine certification is, whether he supports it, opposes it or whether he’s going to continue simply to engage in the infantile opposition which characterises so much of the conservatives response to Covid.
"This is a global pandemic, it demands of politicians, particularly those in government really tough decisions and we’ve all got a responsibility to live up to that.
"Secondly on the detail, we will, before we bring the proposal to parliament, for parliament to debate and decide through a vote on whether we go ahead with this, the detail of how a scheme will work.
"But can I say to Douglas Ross if I had stood here yesterday or even today and announced as a fait accompli exactly how every single aspect of this was going to operate, Douglas Ross would be here today criticising me for taking for granted the views of parliament and not giving parliament its proper place.
"So we will do this properly, we will do this in the way that people have a right to expect of their government."
More to follow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel