Spencer Elden, now 30 years old, is suing Kurt Cobain’s estate for the image the used of him on their 1991 album ‘Nevermind’, alleging it is child pornography and sexual exploitation.
The lawsuit dated August 24 has been uploaded by Pitchfork and alleges that neither he nor his legal guardians consented to the image or “any images of Spencer or of his likeness”.
The image depicts a fourth month old Elden in a pool with his genitalia exposed reaching for a dollar bill.
The lawsuit has alleged that Cobain agreed to alter the image, covering up his genitals with a sticker that read, “If you’re offended by this, you must be a closet paedophile”.
The lawsuit further alleges Cobain chose the image of him reaching for a dollar bill “like a sex worker”. It also mentions the photographer of the image, Kirk Weddle, and a quote he made in TIME magazine: “It was a great concept—a baby underwater, unable to breathe, going after money on a fishhook.”
It further claims Weddle’s child pornography became the image associated with Nirvana.
“Spencer’s true identity and legal name are forever tied to the commercial sexual exploitation he experienced as a minor which has been distributed and sold worldwide from the time he was a baby to the present day” the lawsuit alleges.
It continues: “Spencer has been and will continue to suffer personal injury by the distribution and possession of child pornography depicting him by persons including the Defendants.
“The permanent harm he has proximately suffered includes but is not limited to extreme and permanent emotional distress with physical manifestations, interference with his normal development and educational progress, lifelong loss of income earning capacity, loss of past and future wages, past and future expenses for medical and psychological treatment, loss of enjoyment of life, and other losses to be described and proven at trial of this matter.”
Elden is seeking $150,000 from 15 defendants, or damages to be determined at trial.
Nevermind was released in 1991 and sold over 30 million copies worldwide.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article