SCOTLAND’S Health Secretary has said the decision to change self-isolation requirements for people arriving from Europe and America should have been communicated jointly.
The decision was announced on Wednesday, with reports appearing early in the day before an official announcement from Whitehall ahead of a similar announcement made by the Scottish Government in the afternoon.
Under the new guidelines, travellers from the US or EU who are fully vaccinated will be able to skip self-isolation after they arrive in the UK.
Speaking at the official opening of a new eye centre at the Golden Jubilee Hospital in Clydebank, Humza Yousaf said: “We’d rather the UK Government had worked with us and we could have got to a joint position and communicated that jointly, that would have been a better position to be in.”
He added: “In terms of communication, I would have preferred it to be done a way where the four nations did that jointly.”
The decision, the Health Secretary said, addresses an “anomaly” over vaccines.
“I think there was a bit of an anomaly there for people who had been vaccinated from vaccines that we would recognise here in Scotland,” he said.
“I’m pleased that anomaly has been fixed.”
Travel has been regarded as one of the main drivers of cases and new variants throughout the pandemic, with people often bringing the virus – and its different mutations – into other countries.
But the Health Secretary said: “There is a difference when it comes to amber list countries and red list countries, so when there is countries that we’re particularly concerned about because of case numbers or maybe a new variant, of course that exemption will apply there.”
When asked if he was confident the traffic light travel system would be able to counter any of the risks of the new rules, Yousaf said: “I can’t stand here truthfully and give you a cast-iron guarantee that a new variant from somewhere across the world would never make its way to the shores of somewhere in the UK.
“That’s not something I can give you a cast iron guarantee on, anyone who did say that would be being untruthful.
“What we’re doing is putting measures in place that we think will allow people some liberty back when people have lived with extreme restrictions for the last 16 to 18 months, but also make sure that we’re not putting people in harm’s way.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel