SCOTTISH independence should be decided by a penalty shoot-out, MPs have heard.
The SNP’s Chris Stephens jokingly proposed the “alternative” idea given Westminster’s refusal to allow a second referendum.
After he noted that football had been raised by several MPs during a Commons debate, Stephens went on to praise Scotland for reaching Euro 2020.
They beat Serbia 5-4 on penalties to qualify for the tournament.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon seeks to gee up Yes movement with new digital campaign
But the Tartan Army failed to progress from their group despite a 0-0 draw with England.
Stephens, MP for Glasgow South West, told the Commons: “There are constitutional debates and some people seem to suggest there is deadlock between those who support Scottish independence and those who don’t – and the fact the Government seems unwilling to grant us a referendum.
“Well, I have an alternative idea: if they’re not willing to give us a referendum, perhaps they could give us a penalty shoot-out to decide the issue.
“We know Scotland’s record at penalty shoot-outs is rather good – we managed to qualify for the Euros winning a penalty shoot-out – and there’s England’s record, which is perhaps somewhat different.
“Let’s not sugar-coat it – it’s as poor as the trains going to and from Southend that we regularly hear from (Sir David Amess, Conservative MP for Southend West).”
England reached the Euro 2020 final but lost 3-2 on penalties to Italy after the scores were level at 1-1 after extra time.
READ MORE: We should have a 'backstop independence vote', but hope it isn't needed
Stephens criticised some UK Government ministers for engaging in a “culture war” with the England football team, adding: “I think it’s hard not to like this particular England football team.
“I think they’re a credit to themselves and a credit to England, and I think some of the racism that England players got after the finals was completely and utterly despicable and should be condemned by every single member of this House.”
In response, the Government’s deputy chief whip Stuart Andrew said: “I have to say to him that when he talks about the independence referendum, we gave the people of Scotland a choice.
"These are not my words: it was a ‘once-in-a-generation opportunity’. They took it, and they decided it was better to stay in the United Kingdom.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel