SCOTLAND’S exams body has been accused of covering “nonsense” by insisting students explain the positives of climate change in their geography tests.
The SQA’s National 5 Geography specification says that, in “understanding the potential consequences of the effects of global climate change” students should give “equal” weight to the "environmental and economic benefits".
It says these may include: “Increased tourism in more northerly latitudes; improved crop yields/varieties; reduced level of dependency on other nations.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says Scottish climate summit is 'one of world's last chances'
The Scottish Greens say that these examples are used in “numerous textbooks” available for the course “despite all reputable climate science warning that increased crop failures and widespread famines are an inevitable consequence of the climate emergency”.
Young Scots climate activist Holly Gillibrand shared a photo on Twitter of her textbook to highlight “the state of climate change education in schools”.
Had a conversation recently about the state of climate change education in schools. I can sum it up in two pictures: these are from my SQA Nat 5 geography revision textbook. pic.twitter.com/tV1bIQQDf4
— Holly Gillibrand (@HollyWildChild) June 19, 2021
Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer said asking students to assess the benefits of climate change was “like asking them to think of all the exciting opportunities that come from their house burning down”.
He went on: “Boosting tourism will hardly be our priority when half a billion climate refugees need a permanent home in cooler northern countries like Scotland over the coming decades.
“Yet again, Scotland’s exams authority has some serious questions to answer.
READ MORE: 'Absolute disgrace': BBC teaches pupils about 'positive' impacts of climate change
“Hosting the COP26 climate summit later this year will offer Scotland the chance to drive change. It means young people can hope to see the solid action that is so urgently needed delivered right on their doorstep.
“In that context, the absolute absurdity of the SQA claiming an upsurge in tourism is a benefit of climate change is not only deeply inappropriate, but downright depressing.”
The MSP also tweeted about the SQA policy in the wake of news that BBC Bitesize would be “reviewing” their material on the positive effects of climate change.
He said that while the BBC’s move was to be praised, the “problem is deeper than that”.
“In Scotland, covering this nonsense is an [SQA] geography course specification!”
Great that the @bbcbitesize are reviewing their 'positive effects of climate change' material thanks to @GeorgeMonbiot.
— Ross Greer (@Ross_Greer) July 1, 2021
The problem is deeper than that though. In Scotland, covering this nonsense is an @sqanews Geography course specification! 👇 https://t.co/xPDJP5OwAw (pg.27) pic.twitter.com/oI8wqj3EWD
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel