INDEPENDENCE activists in Airdrie have faced verbal abuse from Unionists when they protested about the removal of a Saltire from a local park flagpole.
Members of Airdrie for Independence mounted their demonstration exactly an hour before Scotland kicked off their Euro 2020 campaign against the Czech Republic.
As The National reported on Friday, they were protesting about the Saltire at West End Park being replaced by a Union Jack two weeks ago.
Jim Cassidy, who raised the issue with the park owner, North Lanarkshire Council (NLC), told us: “There was some nasty verbal abuse. Apparently I’m a ‘traitor whose faither would be turning in his grave’.”
Despite the counter-demo, Cassidy reckoned the protest was successful: “It was in the respect we have drawn awareness to this.
READ MORE: Better Together boss berates Scottish football fans for not supporting England
“Most local people are completely unaware but more now are.
“We had one woman join us who had never been on a demonstration before but was motivated to do so.
“To be honest the Unionist presence really helped frame the issue.”
NLC is run by a minority Labour administration supported by the Tories and independents, despite the SNP winning most seats and votes at the last local elections.
Although the council owns the park, a voluntary group – Friends of West End Park – looks after it on their behalf.
A spokesperson for NLC said: “The Friends of West End and Centenary Park is a voluntary community organisation run by an independent committee who do a fantastic job looking after the park for the benefit of the local people and visitors.
“Flying the Saltire or Union flag is at the discretion of the committee.”
This newspaper has approached the group for comment, but despite emails promising that somebody would be in touch, they have not responded to a request for comment about the issue.
A letter from the group, which has been seen by Cassidy and The National, claimed it was apolitical and, “very saddened and surprised” that their upgrade to the flagpole was “somehow associated to a political/national cause”.
The flagpole is adjacent to the town’s war memorial, which they also help maintain, and they said they had received several requests from ex-service personnel, veterans and their families, indicating “they felt it would be right that we gave consideration to a British flag”.
READ MORE: The one lesson of the G7 summit? Boris Johnson must grow up and get real
However, Cassidy, himself a former serviceman, is unconvinced: “They state that the group is non-political and non-sectarian, but that doesn’t mean that you can be blind to the political and sectarian connotations linked to the British flag, and one would have had to be living under a rock to have missed them.
“The Saltire which flew there was something all our community had no argument over, and its removal coincides with British Government attempts to rebrand much of Scotland with the British flag in a programme of ‘Union-Jackery’, so it is understandable why people cannot simply accept this is simply an innocent misunderstanding.
“As a former member of the armed forces who used to parade every year with the Royal Engineers on Remembrance Sunday, I do not believe that the wishes of a few veterans and their families should be given greater consideration than the entire community of Airdrie.
“The British Nationalist community does have a particular focus on a few key areas, such as the flying of the British flag, year-round poppy displays and veterans causes, so the decision to remove the Saltire and replace it with the British must be viewed in that context.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel