DURING pre-Covid times, when a party leader was unable to attend the chamber for FMQs, they asked a colleague to stand in for them.
When we learned Douglas Ross was self-isolating after coming into contact with someone with coronavirus symptoms, I found myself oddly hopeful that Jackson Carlaw would be standing in for him yesterday.
I wasn’t exactly his biggest fan when he was Scottish Tory leader. And I often wasn’t particularly kind about him when I wrote about his performance each week at FMQs. But still, you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone.
You find yourself wondering what could have been, if you’d only tried a little harder and listened a little closer. Basically, Jackson Carlaw is my Brad Pitt. I’m Jennifer Aniston. On a bad hair day.
But alas, there was no grand return for Mr Carlaw (above), as Douglas Ross was beamed in live from a hotel room to question the First Minister. Ross asked about the ongoing rammy over pupil exam grades and thankfully, he decided to ditch the performative breathy, Thatcher’s ghost voice when doing so.
READ MORE: Why was Douglas Ross wearing a rainbow pin during FMQs?
Anas Sarwar went for a more broad-brush approach. He asked the FM about decisions taken by the Scottish and UK governments when coronavirus first reached our shores.
Sarwar said: “Last week, the First Minister was rightly critical of the chaos Dominic Cummings described. But does she accept that many of the same decisions were made in Scotland, by this First Minister, and by the Scottish Government?”
“I have always accepted that we made mistakes in the handling of this pandemic,” Nicola Sturgeon replied. “I haven’t – and I won’t – shy away from the responsibility I bear for the handling of every aspect of this.”
Sarwar returned to the point, namely that the UK and Scottish governments had both made mistakes and both had taken too long to act at the beginning of the pandemic.
“Today we are publishing a timeline comparison which shows that, at key moments, and on the big decisions, the UK and Scottish governments were in lockstep,” he said. He ran through a list from his timeline comparison: herd immunity; mass gatherings; Covid-positive patients being sent into care homes; routine testing.
READ MORE: Scripted Douglas Ross is Boris Johnson with a hangover at FMQs debut
The First Minister responded: “I’m glad for him that Anas Sarwar has got the time to do timelines. There’s nothing that he’s just told me there that I don’t know and there’s nothing that I’ve sought to shy away from. I lived through that period as the lead decision-maker.
“I don’t know what point Anas Sarwar (above) is seeking to prove here. The irony now, from many of the same people who criticise me for not acting quickly enough or not being cautious enough at an earlier stage, are the same people who often criticise me for being too cautious and going too slowly in lifting lockdown.”
If you thought Sarwar would let a dig about his very important Word document go unremarked upon, you would be wrong: “I’m not sure why the First Minister is critical of the development of a timeline. I would hope, given the scale of the civil service, there would be a Scottish Government timeline about decision making!’’
He then gave a lengthy run-through of the aforementioned timeline comparison before the Presiding Officer interjected to ask for a ‘“QUESTION, PLEASE.”
“WEEKEND, PLEASE,” shouted everybody else.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel