NICOLA Sturgeon has denied breaching the ministerial code at a Scottish Government Covid briefing following a complaint by a former SNP deputy leader.
Jim Sillars wrote to the Scottish Government on February 25 claiming the First Minister had broken rules over a “sustained attack” on Alex Salmond during the daily conference.
It has now emerged Sturgeon wrote back to him to refute the accusations, saying it was “entirely wrong” to suggest she had cast doubt on the outcome of her predecessor’s sexual assault trial last year, in which he was acquitted of all charges.
The First Minister is due to appear this week before the Holyrood committee which is looking into the Scottish Government’s handling of harassment complaints against Alex Salmond, which was found to be unlawful in a judicial review.
The SNP leader has been accused of misleading parliament over when she knew about allegations of harassment made against her predecessor.
Last Friday Salmond gave evidence to MSPs in a six-hour session during which he repeatedly accused Sturgeon of breaking the ministerial code, but stopped short of saying she should stand down.
During a Covid briefing on February 24, Sturgeon had criticised Salmond and claimed he was peddling conspiracy theories.
She also told the briefing: “The behaviour ... complained of was found by a jury not to constitute criminal conduct and Alex Salmond is innocent of criminality, but that doesn’t mean that the behaviour they complained of didn’t happen and I think it’s important that we don’t lose sight of that.”
Sillars, who was Salmond’s party number two in the early 1990s, wrote to the Permanent Secretary saying: “The complaint is ... based on the attacks on Mr Salmond in a forum that had been arranged by the Scottish Government to inform the public on a subject, the pandemic, a matter of serious public concern, in which maximum publicity would be given to the words of the First Minister.
“It is a gross breach of her duty to use that government-sponsored forum, for a public attack on Mr Salmond in matters not related to the purpose of a briefing to which the media had been invited.”
Responding to the allegations, Sturgeon said it is not the job of the Permanent Secretary or other officials to enforce the code and she did not vet questions put to her by journalists.
She said: “I have never, and would never, call into question the jury’s findings, which I fully respect.”
She added: “I am clear that I did not breach the Ministerial Code.
“Of course, the most appropriate place for me to be questioned about these matters is in front of the Parliamentary Committee.
“And I look forward, at long last, to appearing before the Committee next week when I can lay out the facts of what happened rather than the spurious and unfounded conspiracies that others choose to misrepresent as the truth for their own ends.”
It is understood Sillars has now written back to request his complaint is considered by James Hamilton QC – who is currently investigating if Sturgeon breached the ministerial code over when she knew about the harassment allegations against Salmond – or “some other suitable independent person”.
Meanwhile SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford yesterday rejected Salmond’s accusations that Sturgeon had breached the ministerial code.
“She’s made it clear on a number of occasions that she does not believe she has broken the ministerial code,” he told BBC Radio 4.
“I believe that to be the case as well, this will be put to bed, and we will be able to move on from it to make sure we are dealing with the Covid crisis in the right way, and we’re having that discussion about what Scotland’s future is.”
Blackford also said Salmond had failed to bring forward any evidence of a conspiracy against him.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel