IT’S no secret that those who wish to undermine Scotland have been absolutely revelling in the problems between Nicola Sturgeon and Alex Salmond.
Unionist commentators have turned to utterly ridiculous language to talk down Scotland and her Parliament, with phrases like “one-party state” and “banana republic” thrown around as if they have no meaning.
A one-party state? In a country with a proportional voting system, designed not to produce a majority government? If one party is dominating, then that can only be the fault of the opposition.
There also can't be many one-party states where that one party doesn't even have a majority in parliament.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon rips into Ruth Davidson over House of Lords peerage
As for banana republic? Generally understood to mean a country with a leader who relies on the military and destroys state institutions in a quest for prolonged power, it is quite apparent to any rational person that this does not describe Scotland in any sense.
Last night a former British “diplomat” waded in, offering up some exaggerated language of his own.
@RuthDavidsonMSP reduced Kim Jong Sturgeon to rubble today (witness the latter’s irrelevant ad feminam riposte). If No 10 could stop its Borgia-like plotting for a second, it would see that Davidson is the only Tory capable of leading the fight for the Union in Scotland.
— Christopher Meyer (@SirSocks) February 25, 2021
Christopher Meyer, a former ambassador to the United States and Germany, and the former chairman of the Press Complaints Commission, praised Ruth Davidson’s contribution to FMQs against “Kim Jong Sturgeon”.
Very diplomatic language for someone who spent nearly 40 years in the British Diplomatic Service.
In a tweet Meyer wrote that during FMQs, Ruth Davidson “reduced Kim Jong Sturgeon to rubble today (witness the latter’s irrelevant ad feminam riposte).”
He added: “If No 10 could stop its Borgia-like plotting for a second, it would see that Davidson is the only Tory capable of leading the fight for the Union in Scotland.”
“From the House Of Lords?” asked one Twitter user.
After Davidson said the Scottish Government’s reputation has been “tainted” and the standing of Holyrood has been “diminished” during the inquiry, Sturgeon fired back yesterday.
“Ruth Davidson wants to lecture the rest of us about democratic integrity,” she told the Chamber. “But that’s the same Ruth Davidson who’s about to depart this elected institution, dodge an election, take a seat in the unelected House of Lords, where she will pursue a political career at the taxpayers’ expense, but never have to ask voters for their permission ever again.
“I don't think Ruth Davidson is in the position to lecture anyone about democracy.”
Meyer is married to a life peer – so won’t see any problems with taking a seat in the House of Lords.
But the truth that many Scots understand is that the House of Lords is just one of the many examples of the UK Government’s democratic failures.
Let us remember that the House of Lords now has more than 830 members, second in size only to the National People’s Congress of China.
READ MORE: SNP call for inquiry as London parties push yet more peers into House of Lords
These antiquated institutions are why we have seen 22 consecutive polls showing majority support for Scottish independence.
Elites can do their very best to distract from the failings of the UK, but after this current Holyrood drama is over, those failings will still be there.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel