NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Alex Salmond of living in an “alternative reality” in which he is the victim of a grand conspiracy because he can’t accept “issues in his own behaviour”.
The First Minister also said that while her predecessor had been cleared of 13 counts of sexual assault in the court last year, that didn’t mean that the behaviour the women complained about “didn’t happen”.
The First Minister’s daily coronavirus briefing was derailed by the row with journalists pushing the SNP leader on this week’s dramatic developments.
Salmond had been due in front of Holyrood’s harassment committee in the morning but pulled out after a last-minute intervention from prosecutors saw chunks of his written submission to the Ministerial Code probe censored.
The decision to edit Salmond’s evidence came after the Crown Office told the Parliament they had “grave concerns”.
Sturgeon said any suggestion that the prosecutor’s decisions were in any way politically influenced were “downright wrong”.
The First Minister said she looked forward to appearing before the committee next week.
She added: “And Alex Salmond may be creating an alternative reality in which the organs of the state, not just me and the SNP, and the civil service and the Crown Office and the police and women who came forward, were all part of some wild conspiracy against him for reasons I can’t explain, maybe that’s easier than just accepting that at the root of all this might just have been issues in his own behaviour.
“But that’s for him to explain if he ever decides to pitch up and sit in front of the committee.”
Answering a question about the complainants, she said she worried their voices had been silenced: “The behaviour they complained of was found by a jury not to constitute criminal conduct and Alex Salmond is innocent of criminality, but that doesn’t mean that the behaviour they claimed didn’t happen, and I think it’s important that we don’t lose sight of that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel